Search

Just another WordPress site

Candidate uses photo of 11-year-old girl for anti-rainbow ‘smear campaign’

October 13, 2020 by www.stuff.co.nz Leave a Comment

The parents of an 11-year-old Wellington girl are upset their daughter’s name and photo have been used by a political candidate for an anti-rainbow “smear campaign”.

A social media post which was shared last week to the Facebook page of the New Conservative Party’s Elliot Ikilei, names Charli Bickerton, 11, who recently featured on KEA Kids News going behind the scenes of Circa Theatre’s The Glitter Garden, a drag show for children.

“Highly sexualised, heavy make-up on a child,” Ikilei wrote about Charli in his post, which links to her news story. He also inferred that drag queens were “grooming” children.

Natasha and Blair Bickerton, say their daughter’s story for Stuff channel KEA Kids News has been misappropriated and used for political purpose, as an attack on the rainbow community.

READ MORE:KEA Kids News: Going behind the glitter and glee of New Zealand’s first drag musical for kidsJacinda Ardern promises Facebook and fiscal transparency for election 2020Queenstown mayor Jim Boult subject of ‘orchestrated smear campaign’ but not blackmail, police say

Ikilei did not seek any permission to use their daughter’s identifying details in his post, nor would they have allowed it, under any circumstances. They had asked Ikilei to remove the post, however he had not responded to them.

Asked by Stuff whether he would remove the post, Ikilei said: “All I did was put the link in; it was yourselves [Stuff] who thought it would be a good idea to plant a child with drag makeup right on the cover.”

Asked whether he could see how the post could be offensive to the Bickertons, or whether he thought he misappropriated the KEA Kids News story, he said: “I did wonder as to why you would use a child to push adult entertainment onto children.”

Blair Bickerton feels Ikilei is unfairly able to get away with having the post online and use his daughter’s identity for political gain. The Bickertons had never heard of the party before being made aware of the post.

“The original purpose of [the KEA Kids News article] was to support that community – don’t use her name, age and face for a smear campaign,” Natasha Bickerton said.

Previously Hugo Grrrl, who organised The Glitter Garden, said they had received death threats and other abuse after Ikilei shared “misinformation” about the show.

Netsafe chief executive Martin Cocker said the challenge with the post being allowed to remain up lay in the fact the girl’s original news report was posted to a public forum, Stuff.

However, ethically, Ikilei would have to weigh up his own political motivations with responsibilities around protecting minors, and whether the post was fair on the 11-year-old, Cocker said.

A lot of content being produced during the election was more protected as it was classified as politically-motivated, Cocker said. “Political speech is the most-protected speech.”

RNZ
Victoria University researchers have analysed over one thousand Facebook posts placed by the parties and leaders over a two-week period.

Facebook was developing strong hate speech provisions, and attempting to establish other provisions which may provide guidance in cases like this, Cocker said.

An Electoral Commission spokeswoman said the commission did not regulate the content of election advertisements. “This means that issues such as factual accuracy or offensive or misleading advertising are not matters that we can assist with.”

In a statement, a Facebook spokesperson said keeping children safe was “one of our most important responsibilities”.

Material that violated any of its bullying, harassments or image privacy policies would be removed as soon as the company was made aware of it, they said.

The Glitter Garden deals with themes of children accepting themselves, and being a good friend.

As of Tuesday evening, the post appeared to have been deleted. It was unclear who removed it.

Stuff

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Whats App
  • Reddit
  • Email

Filed Under: National politics, ten years old girl, birthday wishes for 7 year old girl, what to buy a 20 year old girl, boy 11 years old, cute boy 11 year old, jobs for 11 year old kids, 11 year old kids, what is the average weight for a 11 year old, girl 11 years old, pretty 4 year old girls

Time to come out: Hi, I’m Sarah, and I’m intersex

November 21, 2018 by www.stuff.co.nz Leave a Comment

OPINION: So *deep breath* I’m coming out.

Which isn’t huge news to anyone who knows me, as I’ve been out as lesbian for about a quarter century now.

However, I have something else to come out about … I’m also intersex.

Cue the Law & Order “thump-thump” sound.

This is something I’ve known about myself for over a decade. Some medical professionals have known longer than I have, and I’ll touch on this later. But my family and some of my closest friends have been aware of this for some time now.

READ MORE:Shortland Street introduces first intersex characterEditorial: Gender changes raise important questionsThe Kiwis whose gender doesn’t fit in a ‘neat little box’

Do I trumpet being intersex to the rafters? No, it’s been private to me, and something I felt like I didn’t need to mention to anyone but those closest to me.

However, recent events have made me rethink how important it is be to be out.

For those that aren’t familiar, intersex is an umbrella term for those that are born with a range of reproductive/sexual anatomy, hormonal conditions, or chromosomal arrangements that don’t quite fit traditional binary definitions of male and female. 

Just under two per cent of all people are born intersex, which is approximately the same number of people born with red hair, or with green eyes.

Intersexuality has been around longer than humanity has been a species, as it is present across all animals.

My particular condition is that I have Partial Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (PAIS) which, not to be too technical about it, means that my body doesn’t quite respond to androgens like testosterone the same way it does for y’all.

Basically, my body simply doesn’t work like most people’s do with hormones.

Some intersex people present as female at birth, their intersex status unbeknownst. Some male like me. Some are very apparently intersex. Being intersex is a whole range of embodiments.

In my case, I was born, and assumed to be, male because that’s what my genitals appeared to be. I grew up with all the traditional narrow expectations of a boy, though I hardly fitted those expectations well. That in itself is hardly remarkable, as should be a wonderful range of ways of being a boy.

I was quiet, quite the nerd, living submerged in books, although I was also hugely into swimming and skiing. Not especially feminine nor masculine, just somewhere in between.

But by the time everyone in my peer group was going through puberty, two things were evident to me; one, that I was a chick, and two, that I wasn’t going through puberty like everyone else was.

Photos of me going into my late teens show someone that could easily be thirteen or younger. I had long hair, and merely putting it in different styles had me able to shift between gendered androgynies. I was told I made guys uncomfortable by walking into the guys’ toilets at the time, though interestingly enough I wasn’t told the same about the women’s toilets.

I got massive cramps through my abdomen periodically that had me curled up on my bed in pain. Mood swings were all over the place.

My voice never dropped, and I just got some peach fuzz on my face, not much more than your average woman.

During these years I thought maybe I was transgender, despite all the things that trans people described feeling that I didn’t. This was the early 1990s after all, and finding anything on intersexuality outside dense biology textbooks was virtually unheard of.

I even wondered if I was simply gay, even though I wasn’t really attracted to guys. This was how much not having information impacted me.

I was to find out much much later, that at around age nineteen a hospital expert wrote on my file “possible intersex?”. But I was never told, something I am still frustrated at and pained about to this day. Still, I got access to hormones, and after a dosage was worked out for me, my mood swings dropped away and the abdominal cramps stopped.

I had my name changed to Sarah to match what everyone called me anyway, and focused on the important stuff to me, like coming out as lesbian, and working hard at university and later graduate school overseas. I faded into gender normativity like many queer woman, albeit one that had been disowned by her parents when they realised I wasn’t going to deny myself.

I focused on my studies, going on to work as a sociology lecturer in the US. I only found out I was intersex by happening across diagnostic criteria in my 30s, having a “wait a moment” moment, and presenting to a doctor.

The one thing that never happened to me, however, was surgery.

A great number of intersex infants and youth with more pronounced and apparent conditions than mine are operated on without their permission, or even without their parents’ permission. This is done in order to ‘normalise’ them and is considered ‘corrective’.

Many intersex activists are bravely working to end this practice and to ensure that intersex people have autonomy and control over their bodies; that we can choose what we have done. Our bodies, our choice.

I was lucky enough to avoid this, but now – as an adult – I had the choice to have surgery to fit my body to myself, which for me is something not unlike sex alignment surgery for transgender people, but with other potentialities due to being intersex.

The thing is, I simply couldn’t afford it. It was pursue university studies or have surgery, and studies won every single damn time, even if that meant living with a body that for me didn’t align.

You could say that, while being trans and intersex are two different things, what both groups have in common is a need for bodily autonomy.

Not having infants or youth operated on without their consent easily fits with also advocating for having trans and intersex people, from their teens onward, being able to have ownership over their bodies. To be able to chose surgeries and hormones, to be able to decide what interventions are necessary for yourself, even if that decision is for none, is fundamental here.

Having your body operated on without consent, or being denied it when you desperately need it, are two sides of the same coin.

So, it should come as no surprise that while they can be very different things, and have their own unique considerations, many of the interests of transgender, non-binary, and intersex people can align. Some intersex people are transgender, some intersex people are not, some are non-binary, some are not. Just like all different groups in society, people can exist across multiple categories, even if those categories are different.

But, why am I saying something now? I really don’t have to after all. I’m pākehā, over-educated (finally finishing my doctorate back here in New Zealand), with an upper-middle-class upbringing, and my parents did come around to accept me, so my privilege protects me and I can easily blur into the background.

There are two reasons.

First, transgender and non-binary people are being concertedly targeted by small but vocal hate groups. This is occurring internationally, but we’re also seeing it here in Aotearoa, with such hate groups often positioning this as a divide between transgender people and feminists, purporting to speak for cis-gender (ie non-transgender) women.

Particularly in Aotearoa these groups are being mobilised around passage of the ‘Births, Deaths, Marriages, and Relationships Registration Bill’, which amongst other things updates how gender is recorded on official documents to align how we understand gender today, and simply to update the legislation.

Well, I’m not transgender, I’m a cis woman and I’m a feminist, and I stand with my transgender friends against such hate. Our society needs to acknowledge gender diversity, and having one’s gender recognised in official records is such a basic and fundamental thing – it’s a no-brainer for me simply in terms of justice and respect.

Being a voice to say to transgender and non-binary people that they are not alone in this, is the absolute least I can do.

Secondly, things like the ‘Births, Deaths, Marriages, and Relationships Registration Bill’ provides a benefit for so many intersex people too, but yet we are virtually never mentioned in this discussion.

I, for one, will finally be able to have ‘F’ on all my official documentation, not having to fear discrimination or having to explain myself. 

Being able to stand up and say that intersex people are a part of this too is crucial, and really needs to be said, given how often we are invisible in this. Intersex people tend to be spoken of, not often speaking ourselves. But we are here, and should damn well be recognised.

Gender and sex are complex, despite what these hate groups would like you to believe. The categories of sex and gender we thought were simple in earlier times, are with more knowledge today being revealed to be, unsurprisingly, intricate and nuanced. While it may feel comfortable to cling to those older, simpler constructions, to do so perpetuates oppression and marginalisation.

Being open to having our ideas about gender challenged by new information is a sign of a generous and kind society, to continue off the words of our Prime Minister.

What we consider a woman or a man has shifted immensely over the last 100 years.

While I’m not butch, I am a tomboy. I assert myself more than is considered traditionally feminine, and I’m at a high level in my profession. I’m never going to settle down and have children. Not long ago, all of these choices of mine, and more, were considered highly inappropriate for a woman. Some still are.

But the category of what it means to be a ‘woman’ is broadening, as is the category of ‘man’. Further, given such breadth, surely it’s not that much more of a stretch to see that there are things outside just these two categories as well.

We’re pushing the boundaries of what we knew, or thought we knew, to new ways of understanding. Isn’t that cool? Isn’t that worth fighting for? Isn’t that worth standing up for?

I’m a sociologist by training, focusing on politics and policy, gender and technology, teaching, researching, and studying across all these subjects, and if there is one thing I know, it’s that including all parts of society (however messy and scary) is fundamentally important.

But that inclusion only happens when we accept people as they are, not by forcing them to be something we think they should be.

Or by thinking that they have to make us comfortable first; change is painful, folks.

This is why I’m coming out … to be counted. Something that is so important at this time in history.

To stand up for myself as someone who is intersex, and for other communities, like transgender and non-binary people. Make no mistake, no rights were ever won by staying silent.

So yeah, I’m coming out.

Hi, I’m Sarah, and I’m intersex.

Sarah Hendrica Bickerton is a PhD candidate and research assistant in the School of Government at Victoria University of Wellington. She has lived in New Zealand, the Netherlands, and the United States. The views in this article are her own, and are not those of the School of Government nor that of Victoria University of Wellington.Further linkshttps://www.facebook.com/intersexyouthaotearoa/https://ihra.org.au/19853/welcome/https://interactadvocates.org/i-want-to-be-like-nature-made-me/

Send us your stories

  • View This Assignment
  • View All Contributions

Stuff Nation

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Whats App
  • Reddit
  • Email

Filed Under: Uncategorized life-style

Former banker who held ‘raucous’ weddings on £3M country estate without planning permission is embroiled in bitter row with locals over ‘blasting Sweet Home Alabama’ and ‘intolerable Blackpool-style lights’

February 2, 2021 by www.dailymail.co.uk Leave a Comment

Local villagers have revealed their ‘devastation’ over a planning row which erupted with a former high flying banker who transformed his country seat into a luxury £3 million wedding venue.

Green Cow founders Joe and Keeley Evans, from Herefordshire, spent £3m building a luxury events complex on their 1,500-acre Whitbourne Estate, and marketed the venue a year as a space for weddings, art exhibitions, wellness retreats and parties.

The website for Crumplebury, 1.5 miles from Whitbourne village, advertised ‘raucous’ woodland celebrations, fine dining and ‘hang-over Bloody Marys’, with the venue pre-selling events and weddings worth £1m before it opened in November 2019.

But within a fortnight of the first event, the couple were targeted with noise complaints from neighbours – living around 400metres away – who complained of ‘devastating’ and ‘life changing’ noise, ‘traffic chaos’ and ‘loud, amplified music.’

In November 2020, Herefordshire Council rejected an application to change the planning permisison to allow the venue to be used for weddings. 

Although celebrations are on hold because of the pandemic, the venue has a number of pre-bookings from 2020, which have been moved to 2021 and the couple could fulfil the bookings while appealing the decision. 

Local villagers in Herefordshire have revealed their ‘devastation’ over a planning row which erupted with former high flying banker Joe Evans and his wife Keeley after they transformed his country seat into a luxury £3 million wedding venue

The £3 million Crumplebury venue is just a short distance from the nearest homes, as well as a local village 

The 1,500-acre Whitbourne Estate, near Bromyard on the Herefordshire-Worcestershire border, has been privately owned by Mr Evans’ family since 1860, and was built by vinegar magnate Edward Bickerton Evans.

The former country seat of the world’s largest vinegar manufacturer, the historic estate enjoyed a harmonious rapport with its neighbours in a green and tranquil corner of rural Herefordshire.  

RELATED ARTICLES

  • Previous
  • 1
  • Next
  • Do you suffer from the 3pm slump? These multivitamin tablets… Promoted Woman reveals how she got revenge on the girl who stole her…

Share this article

Share

Its grand Palladian-style hall – known locally as ‘Vinegar Hall’ – was sold to developers in the 1980s, with the family retaining the remainder of the estate for mixed retail, farming and recreational use.

Whitbourne’s Longlands Care Farm school caters to vulnerable youngsters excluded from mainstream education, and hosted a visit from the Princess Royal, Princess Anne, in 2017 in recognition of two long-serving Riding for the Disabled ponies.

The website for Crumplebury advertised ‘raucous’ woodland celebrations, fine dining and ‘hang-over Bloody Marys’, with the venue pre-selling events and weddings worth £1m before it opened in November 2019

Mr Evans – who is chair of the local Country Land and Business Association Branch – returned to the family home in 2011 after a high-flying overseas career in corporate banking with HSBC, a position which took him and then girlfriend Keeley to Jersey, India and the Philippines.

The couple set about modernising and diversifying the estate, taking over from Mr Evans’ father Bill, and in 2012 they transformed a disused pigsty into the Green Cow restaurant, initially to cater to pheasant hunting parties attending the Whitbourne Shoot.

But their ambitions didn’t end there and the couple secured planning permission to realise Crumplebury, borrowing £3m against Whitbourne’ assets for the building project.

Speaking to Living Magazine about their plans in 2018, Mr Evans said: ‘I wouldn’t say I am a chilled person, but I am confident. 

The couple secured planning permission for ‘a restaurant, accommodation and a conference centre and for no other purpose,’ to realise Crumplebury, borrowing £3m against Whitbourne’ assets for the building project

‘One of the advantages of having been a banker is that I’m not afraid to borrow sums that would leave other people ashen-faced. I have done the sums.’ 

However, despite a clause in Mr Evans’ planning agreement stating that the venue could be used for ‘restaurant, accommodation and a conference centre and for no other purpose,’ it appears that he believed weddings and other events would be allowed.

The state-of-the-art venue comprises a grand banqueting hall for 200, a lounge, bar, gallery, eleven bedrooms and a private cottage.

It opened in November 2019 after pre-selling events and weddings worth £1m – but within a fortnight was targeted with noise complaints.      

The couple’s state-of-the-art venue comprises a grand banqueting hall for 200, a lounge, bar, gallery, eleven bedrooms and a private cottage (pictured, during building) 

Retired fencing contractor Nick Bakewell, 70, and wife Jan have lived in their three bedroom cottage overlooking Whitbourne for thirty years.

He explained: ’This is a beautifully quiet place, but the noise from Crumplebury was horrendous. 

‘The first function was chaotic. There were cars going in and out, and up and down the lanes. 

‘The whole site was lit up like Blackpool illuminations, and Joe Evans had the audacity to turn around and tell us it wasn’t too bad.’

Locals have said the first events at the venue were ‘chaotic’, calling the noise ‘horrendous’ and comparing the site to ‘like Blackpool illuminations’ 

He continued: ‘Crumplebury was never intended to be a wedding venue, and on that basis the original planning application sailed through without objection.

‘The reality is that Joe Evans didn’t have planning permission for the functions he was advertising. He’s fallen out with everyone.’

Another Whitbourne local said: ‘They’ve got 1,500 acres, but for some inexplicable reason they chose to perch this development on the furthest edge of the estate, pointing towards our community.

Another neighbour said the venue was ‘on the furthest edge of the estate’ and ‘pointed towards’ the local community 

‘At night, it’s lit up like a cruise liner or a nuclear power station.

‘There was never any mention of weddings in the original planning application, but the first one they held we could hear every single word of Sweet Home Alabama blasting out across the valley.

‘I burst into tears and told my husband ,”We’re going to have to move”. It was intolerable. I can’t tell you how shocked we were.

‘All hell broke loose. At that point, villagers contacted planning enforcement and environmental health.

Nick Bakewell, 70, and wife Jan have lived in their three bedroom cottage overlooking Whitbourne for thirty years

HCC planners advised Mr and Mrs Evans to apply to have the restrictive clause in their agreement removed – but villagers hired a barrister to represent their worries.

The application was met with dozens of objections, including representatives of the National Trust and the Council for the Protection of Rural England.

A written submission from Whitbourne Parish Council cited neighbours’ concerns about ‘post party outside noise – laughing, shouting and car doors slamming, and added: ‘The applicants are heavily advertising the facility as a wedding venue for up to 250 guests and they also encourage ‘raucous’ celebrations on their web-site.’

He said the neighbourhood is usually ‘beautiful and quiet’ but compared the first events held at the site to ‘like Blackpool illuminations’

Mr and Mrs Evans spent £12,000 installing and testing an ‘acoustic curtain’ to try to address noise concerns.

Planning officers backed their application to allow weddings and parties at Crumplebury, but councillors sitting on HCC’s planning committee voted against it.

The couple have been told they must abide by their original planning permissions – and may only use the site for business conferences. 

They said: ‘We are devastated by the decision made by Herefordshire Council’s planning committee.

Nick said the local couples would ‘fight’ Joe and Keeley ‘every step of the way’ if the couple appeal against a decision made by local councillors not to grant them planning permission  for weddings at the site 

‘We have worked round the clock to create a sustainable space which is both aesthetically beautiful and environmentally sympathetic. 

‘It is crushing to face such opposition. This is our community, and we care deeply about it.’ 

The couple have now removed references to weddings on the website and are planning to appeal the decision. 

They declined an interview but said in a statement: ‘We were simply seeking approval to operate within the parameters of our site description, which was granted planning permission in 2017.

‘We strive for Crumplebury to be a force for good and have worked tirelessly to address head-on any concerns raised by the community.’

Mr Bakewell added: ‘We are biding our time and waiting to see what their next move is. If they appeal, we shall fight them every step of the way.’ 

Filed Under: Uncategorized dailymail, Femail, Couple transformed country seat luxury 3 million wedding venue fight locals, lynyrd skynyrd sweet home alabama tab, tab for sweet home alabama, when was sweet home alabama made, sweet home alabama full movie, tabs sweet home alabama, tabs for sweet home alabama, reese witherspoon sunglasses in sweet home alabama, download sweet home alabama, free sweet home alabama ringtone, alabama sweet home alabama

Copyright © 2021 Search. Power by Wordpress.