• Skip to main content

Search

Just another WordPress site

Biden when the stock market crashed

Stock Market Crash Isn’t Over, According To Indicator With ‘Perfect’ Track Record

August 17, 2022 by www.forbes.com Leave a Comment

  • Share to Twitter
  • Share to Linkedin

Topline

The stock market has minted a stunning rally amid hopes that the worst of the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes has passed and inflation has cooled, but Bank of America analysts on Tuesday warned that prices remain too high and stocks still too expensive for the bear market to be over, at least according to one rule that’s held perfectly true in the past.

Key Facts

In a Tuesday note to clients, Bank of America analyst Savita Subramanian said a sustained bull market remains “unlikely” even though the S&P 500 has surged more than 16% to 4,262 points since hitting a low this year on June 16, the day after Fed officials authorized the biggest interest rate hike in 28 years to combat decades-high inflation.

Subramanian and her team track a long list of indicators (Fed cutting rates, unemployment rising or markets rallying 5%) that help signal the start of a bull market, but so far just 30% of those items have been fulfilled; historically, 80% of the list is checked off before markets bottom out.

In particular, they write that no bear market since 1935 has ever ended when the consumer price index and S&P’s average price/earnings ratio add up to 20 or more—a phenomenon called the “Rule of 20” that signals stocks remain too expensive relative to their earnings and likely have further room to fall; with 8.5% inflation, the metric currently sits at 28.5.

In order to satisfy the rule and signal stocks may once again be due for a bull market rally, S&P 500 firms would have to beat earnings expectations by an average of 50%, Subramanian says—or in more extreme scenarios, the S&P would need to tumble more than 40% to 2,500 points, or inflation fall to 0%.

The bank’s research suggests the consumer staples and consumer discretionary sectors are most at risk in the current environment, though staples could hold up better as retail giants like Walmart and Target report that consumers are increasingly shifting spending toward necessities like food and gas, as opposed to discretionary items like clothing and home furnishings.

The analysts aren’t alone in raising flags: On Monday, a team led by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management’s Lisa Shalett said it’s “not ready to say ‘all clear’” because recession indicators are still flashing and earnings expectations have not fallen enough to account for slower economic growth, adding that “stocks are vulnerable to any data that doesn’t confirm the bullish narrative.”

Key Background

Major stock indexes plunged into bear market territory in June as investors awaited the Fed’s biggest interest rate hike since 1998, but stocks have since largely recovered on hopes that inflation has finally peaked. At one point down 23% this year, the S&P is now off just 11% since the start of January. However, the economy unexpectedly shrank for a second consecutive quarter this year, and fears of a looming recession still haven’t subsided. Expectations for third-quarter economic growth have fallen, particularly due to worse-than-projected housing market data.

Chief Critic

“While recession risks remain high—odds are about even through 2023—the most likely outlook remains that the economy will avoid a downturn,” Moody’s Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi wrote in a weekend note. He notes the job market has remained resilient despite worries over the economy and points to recently declining inflation numbers as “especially encouraging.”

Further Reading

Dow Falls 200 Points, Stocks Lose Steam After Target Profits Plunge (Forbes)

‘Make No Mistake’: Bear Market Isn’t Over And These Stocks Could Lead The Next Plunge, Morgan Stanley Warns (Forbes)

Filed Under: Investing Stock Market Crash, Federal Reserve, Mark Zandi, Investing, indicators stock market crash, next stock market crash 3 indicators, stock market crash 3 indicators, stock market crash 9 indicators, top stock market crash indicators, best stock market crash indicators

Going Back to School with Stock Market Fundamentals

August 15, 2022 by www.investopedia.com Leave a Comment

Make that four weeks in a row of gains for the U.S. stock market, as the rally has become undeniable. The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq both climbed more than 3% last week, with the the Dow up 2.9%. The S&P 500 has now climbed 15% from its lows in mid-June, while the Nasdaq has clawed back 20% since then. That could technically be described as a new bull market for the index. A 20% retracement from a recent low fits the bill—or the bull—but there are a lot of opinions about that. But we can’t deny the strength of the rally, especially when we dig into the charts. The average stock in the Nasdaq Composite index is up 34% from its lows. Remember, just a few months ago, we were talking about the average Nasdaq stock being down 50% from its highs. The pendulum has swung back in a big way. Across the market, the breadth thrust has been pretty impressive. And no, that’s not a swimming stroke.

The breath trust indicator is a technical indicator used to ascertain market momentum . It is computed by calculating the number of advancing issues on an exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) , divided by the total number of issues—advancing plus declining—on it, and generating a ten-day moving average of this percentage. The Breadth Thrust Indicator was developed by Martin Zweig, a legendary investor, advisor and writer. That’s why some people call it the Zweig breath indicator. According to Zweig, there’s only been 14 breadth thrusts since 1945, and we’re in the middle of a brand new one. Ninety percent of the components in the S&P 500 are now above their 50-day moving average. That’s the highest level since November of 2021. The average gain following a breadth thrust, according to Zweig, is 24.6% in an average timeframe of 11 months. And a majority of bull markets? Those begin with breadth thrusts—they’re important.

Better economic news may have something to do with improving sentiment. Consumer confidence crept up again, according to the University of Michigan’s latest Consumer Sentiment Index (MCSI) , and both consumer and producer inflation were down from their highs last month. Those may be the signs the Fed is looking for to believe that its rate-hiking battle against inflation is working, and maybe it will cool the pace of rate hikes at the next two FOMC meetings this year. Fed funds futures now show a 55% probability that the Fed will hike rates by half a percent at its meeting that begins September 21, and a 45% probability it will hike by another three-quarters of a percentage point. That number flip-floped last week, after the inflation numbers were released.

Meanwhile, the bond market continues to take a pessimistic view of the economic outlook, with the spread between the two-year and the 10-year yields continuing its inversion at negative 41 basis points (bps) . Translation: bond investors do not have high hopes for the near-term prospects for the economy. That tug of war has a lot of rally doubters calling the recent surge in stocks a sucker’s rally . The short-interest percentage of the average stock in the S&P 500 remains at highs we haven’t seen since April of 2020. Short interest indicates how many shares of a company, index, or ETF are currently sold short—betting they’ll decline. That’s pretty pessimistic, but it could also be one of those contrarian indicators where extreme bearishness is a sign that the market could turn—and it has.

Subscribe Now : Apple Podcasts / Spotify / Google Podcasts / PlayerFM

Meet Brian Feroldi

Brian Feroldi is a financial educator who has written extensively about money, personal finance, and investing ever since he graduated from college in 2004. He shares his knowledge with the world on Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, and the Motley Fool. Brian first began investing in 2004, and his individual stock picks have consistently outperformed the market since.

In 2015, Brian became a full-time writer for the Motley Fool. He has since written more than 3,000 articles on stocks, investing, and personal finance. He has also appeared on a number of podcasts and videos.

In 2020, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, Brian spent more than 20 hours hosting “Fool Live”, a members-only Zoom session. Brian helped thousands of individual investors to keep calm and collected during the worst of the crisis.

What’s in this Episode?

It’s easy for investors like us to overthink how we invest. There’s so many options, so much information, and so many reasons for us to not take risks. And then there’s our animal spirits, telling us to run when we’re scared and be greedy when we’re confident. But what if we stripped out all of our primitive instincts back to the basics and asked ourselves some super-fundamental questions? Why should we invest? Why would we want to invest in stocks? Why does the stock market go up? Not every year—but its track record over the past 150 years—it’s pretty good. Brian Feraldi, the longtime financial journalist and market watcher, has written a terrific book that addresses some of these questions. It’s called Why Does The Stock Market Go Up? , covering everything you should have been taught about investing in school, but weren’t. And Brian is our special guest this week on the Investopedia Express. Welcome, Brian.

Brian: “Thanks, Caleb, for having me. Great to be here.”

Caleb: “I would normally ask why you wrote the book, but you wrote the book because nobody teaches these fundamentals. I mean, we do on Investopedia, but nobody’s put it in a beautiful little book, kind of like the way you’ve done with yours. Was that the inspiration just to try to distill all of this down to the basics, the ABCs and 123s of why this stock market of ours just has this magic way of going up year after year?”

Brian: “Very, very much so. I discovered investing right after I graduated from college in 2004, and as soon as I read my first book about money and personal finance, I just went on a binge reading series where I just devoured absolutely every book that I could possibly get. And I’ve read all of the classics on investing about Warren Buffett, Peter Lynch, Jack Bogle, etc, and they are just phenomenal, fantastic resources for investors. But the number one question that I had about investing was the title of my book: why does the stock market go up? So many of those fantastic books all say you should save a portion of your income, you should invest with a long-term mindset, you should dollar-cost average into the market, and the market continually goes up. And I was like, I believe you—I see the long-term history of the S&P 500—but what was never explained to me was why—what was the underlying force that caused the market to go up over time? So, because I personally was seeking that information 20 years ago, now that I know it, I just believe that there is a huge missing gap in the education of the average shareholder out there, that they don’t know why it’s going up.

Caleb: “Yeah, we take it for granted. But if you do look at the track record, we’re looking at somewhere between nine and 11% average annual returns going back all the way to the latter part of the 19th century. The stock market’s been through a lot—we know that—lots of crashes, lots of bull markets, lots of bear markets. But there is this insurmountable climb that just keeps going up and to the right. And I don’t think enough people stop and ask themselves that question, we just take it for granted. Well, put your money into the stock market and, like magic, it goes up. But really, you and I have been around the block on this, in our careers. We see a lot of companies with no profits where were the stock goes up over time. We saw that with meme stocks, you see it in internet stocks, and probably going all the way going back to the tulip mania of the 17th century. You know, there’s this notion that it might be profitable one day, it might have the best idea, so investors put a lot of faith into the future even when they can’t see it.

Since its inception in 1926, the S&P 500 has yielded an average annual return of about 10.5%. Prior to 1957, the predecessor index to the S&P 500 (known as the S&P 90) included only 90 major stocks. The current composition of the index, with 500 component stocks, dates back to 1957. From 1957 through 2021, the S&P 500 has yielded an average annual return of 10.67%. During this period, annual returns have ranged from a maximum gain of 38.06% in 1958 to maximum loss of 38.49% in 2008, at the height of the Global Financial Crisis.

Brian: “I think that one of the most tricky things about investing is that in the short term, there’s absolutely no correlation at all with what a stock does and what the business itself is doing—a company can be losing money, could be losing customers, could be losing market share, and its stock could still go up. In 2020, we saw basically every stock go straight up. And in fact, the riskier the stock, the faster it went up. While this year, we’ve seen the exact opposite, where some companies are still growing, they’re increasing their margins, increasing their customers, increasing their profits, and their stocks have been going straight down. This is why Benjamin Graham’s wonderful quote is so appropriate: “In the short term, the market is a voting machine. In the long term, the market is a weighing machine.” The aim for my book and the aim for a lot of my education is to just make investors aware what the heck the “weighing machine” part of that equation means. If you look at the news or if you look at your phone, the only information that most investors—99% of individual investors—get about a stock, is price.

Caleb: “Yeah, absolutely. And they’re always looking at price. Why? Because the financial media, present company included, is making a big deal about price because that’s the sports game aspect of it. That’s like, you know, the pre game is the pre market activity, the kickoff is the opening bell, the halftime report is the halftime of the game, and then the closing bell. We deal with price—we’re always talking about the Dow Jones Industrial Average or the Nasdaq, or this or that, or people are talking about the stock price of a company, but they’re talking about it really kind-of in a vacuum. And what we want to be thinking about is: what is this company’s ability to grow over time, and will investors appreciate the rise in its earnings and its growth over time and put more money into it? That’s where the real money is made—am I wrong?”

Brian: “Oh, very, very much so. What the price of a company does and what the business performance of the company does is 100% linked in the long run. Look at any of the largest most successful companies that exist today—Apple, UnitedHealth Group, Google, etc. Why are those stocks up many, many times in value since those companies first became public ten, 20, 30 years ago? In every case, the answer is the same: revenue and profits today are substantially higher than they were five years ago, ten years ago, 20 years ago. That growth in profits has led to the increase in the value of the organization, and shareholders have done very well by buying and holding those businesses. But if you look at all—all of the biggest winners of the last ten, 20, 30, 40, 50 years—in every single case, those shareholders of those great businesses were put through short term periods of immense pain—drawdowns of 50, 60, even 70% or more along the way to them delivering those huge returns.”

Caleb: “Let’s talk about our emotions and our animal spirits—I brought them up at the top. They want us to do, usually, the wrong thing when it comes to investing because we have this survival instinct. We talked about it with Josh Brown last week. We have this survival instinct about being fearful. When things are scary, we make some bad decisions. We want to sell our portfolios. When we get really greedy, we think we can pick the right stocks all the time and keep buying and keep making money, but often those turn against us. Why does that happen?”

Brian: “The reason that that happens is that every human was born naturally to be a terrible investor. All of our innate desires, all our innate thoughts are designed around self-preservation and designed around fear, right? We don’t want to be seen as different than the group. We take our cues from other people. The same exact principle applies to investing—if other people are excited about a stock and that stock’s going up, it naturally draws us in, and people want to buy stocks after they’ve gone up. Conversely, if other people are fearful about the economy and stocks are going down, our natural inclination is to sell, because we’re taking our cues from other people. That is just human nature. And that’s going to be the case essentially for as long as I’m alive. If you want to do well as an investor, you have to learn to resist the urge to take your cues from other humans. Boy, is that really, really hard to do—when you see other people making money easily, like what happened in 2020, and everybody’s bullish, everyone’s excited—it feels like it’s the safest time to invest because stocks are up so much.

Caleb: “Which is why your book is so valuable. Okay, we talk about the market in these general terms, but inside the mechanisms of it—and most folks don’t care about this—but you and I watch this very closely. It’s changed a lot, in the last 20 years or so, for a bunch of reasons. Right? There’s a lot more access to the stock market, there’s a lot more information, there are a lot more institutions out there that are involved in the stock market, trading through algorithms and very sophisticated software programs, trading on metrics, trading on technical cues, and moving hundreds of millions of dollars around before we could even think about buying or selling a stock. That creates a lot of noise and a lot of activity and volatility and volume, which affects individual investors like me, you, and our listeners who are just trying to put together the right portfolio, do the right thing over the long term. Do these outside forces—and they’re big—have a big impact on how we invest or how we should think about investing, or is that just just part of the noise, Brian?”

Brian: “Once you understand the advantages that Wall Street has over new investors, it seems like it’s impossible to make money in the market, because to your point, algorithms out there can find the news, “interpret the news,” and trade based on the news faster than you can even read the headline of whatever news report that came out. So I kind of scoff to myself when I see other people trying to out-trade the news—it’s like playing poker against other people, except that everyone else can see your cards and you can’t see their cards. I don’t think that’s a game that I could win. Now, thankfully, there is something about investing where individual investors have a massive, massive advantage over professionals. And that one advantage is that we are managing our own money. We have no career risk. We don’t have to meet performance guidelines, we don’t have to explain our moves to anybody else. That allows individuals to truly invest with a long-term mindset. We can absorb huge amounts of short-term volatility. index funds and not care about their short-term performance. That is the source of my long-term advantage over the market—I can’t trade faster, I’m not smarter than the index—but I can be more patient than the index. That’s the kind of thing I like to teach people to do because it’s your only advantage.”

Caleb: “Yeah, you make a great point. We don’t have to trade, we don’t have to buy, or we don’t have to sell. We are not portfolio managers. Most of us, whose job depends on us hitting a quarterly number or beating the benchmark, just need to make smart moves to build our portfolios and our wealth over time. And the truth of the matter is, if you do it consistently, the market delivers, and that’s through the magic of compounding —I call it the fairy dust that’s sprinkled over the stock market and over investors who have this sort of discipline. But if you don’t understand compounding, the rule of 72 , and all these great things that that are so helpful in the process of wealth creation and the growth of the stock market in your portfolio over time, you’re never going to get it. A lot of people come up to me, they probably come up to you, Brian, and they say, “look at my portfolio. I have two shares of this, four of this, six or that, I bought them here and there.” But you and I always say “you’ve got to consolidate the positions, you have to dollar-cost average, you want to own these stocks at a very low average price point over time,” and their heads start to spin, but they’re missing out on the key things, which is this compounding over time—the continued contribution to your portfolio over time, with discipline.

Brian: “Very much so. And one of the biggest mistakes that a lot of investors make, new investors and even seasonsed investors alike, is they forget the number one rule of investing, particulaly If you’re going to buy individual stocks, which is: know what you own and why you own it. Many people in my Twitter or DMs, or even in real life, they tell me I bought x shares of ABC Company and I’m up x percent in x number of weeks, or x number of months. And the thing that I want to say to them is, okay, what does this company do?—Is its revenue up, is its revenue down? How does its balance sheet look like? Who is its management team? What’s its long-term potential? Does it have customer concentration?—asking the fundamental questions that they should be focused on. However, so many people, when they get interested in the stock market, don’t know any of that, don’t pay attention to any of that, don’t even know how to find that information. The only thing that they’re looking at is the ticker and whether or not that ticker is up or down today.

Caleb: “You have a very important series of chapters here, but one that really caught my eye is this whole saving-versus-investing theme. I’ve been having this conversation with my kids and my nephews about what they should be doing in their late teens and their early twenties. What’s your take, because both matter—saving and investing—in terms of growing your wealth, but you have to do both. Where do you fall in that into that camp?”

Brian: “It’s actually a spectrum. It’s very natural for people that are interested in investing, myself included, to really try and hyper-optimize their portfolio to squeeze out an extra 5% of compounding. But if you put that into a compound calculator, an extra 5% of the market over a long period of time, the numbers are just magic. However, one of the truths is if you are new to investing, you are going to realize so much more wealth for yourself by trying to optimize your income and your expenses as opposed to squeezing out that extra return. If you have $10,000 saved and you make an extra one percent or 2% per year, great! Well, that’s a hundred or $200 difference, right? But conversely, if you’re at that stage and you can negotiate a raise, if you can upskill yourself, if you can save an extra five or $10,000, that’s going to have a much bigger impact on your net worth in the beginning. So in the beginning, when you’re just starting out, it’s really important to focus on your income and your expenses and your savings rate.

Caleb: “Great point. Well, your book is so full of good information and laid out very basically—you have to admire that—being the Editor-in-Chief of Investopedia. The more fundamentally you can explain things to people, the better off they are, and people always appreciate that from us, and I definitely appreciate it from your book, Why Does the Stock Market Go Up: Everything You Should Have Been Taught About Investing in School? But Brian, you know we are a site built on our terms, our definitions, our explainers. I’m sure you have a favorite definition of your own or a term. What is it?”

Brian: “Well, thank you for that. And I must say that I am a massive fan of Investopedia—I have used it so many times, to look up definitions, so I just love your site. And if I had to come up with one term that I like, I would probably say it’s gross profit . So gross profit is on the income statement , it is revenue minus the cost of goods sold (COGS) . And this is a metric that I have underestimated for the last ten or 20 years. But more recently, I have come to learn that gross profit is one of the most important numbers that a company—that any given company—can optimize for. And it’s a sign of just how much customers value a company’s product. In fact, I think gross profit is more important than revenue. So that’s one of my favorites.”

Caleb: “Yeah. Are they able to bring those sales down to the bottom line? That’s a very key indicator that shows you how efficiently they operate. Great term—we love that one as well. And you’re probably the first one of our guests to choose gross profit, so, good for you. Brian Feroldi, thanks so much for joining the Express. Folks, follow Brian at mindset.brianferoldi.com, I will put that in the show notes. Thanks so much for joining The Express, Brian.”

Brian: “Thank you very much for having me, Caleb. Great to be here.”

Term of the Week: Reverse Repo

It’s terminology time. Time for us to get smart with the investing and finance term we need to know this week. And this week, we’ve got to give it up to our pal Cassius Kuve for his timely suggestion. Cassius suggests reverse repo this week, and we love that term given what’s about to go down as the Federal Reserve reduces its nearly nine trillion dollar balance sheet. According to my favorite website, a reverse repo, or a reverse repurchase agreement , is a short-term agreement to purchase securities in order to sell them back at a slightly higher rate. Repos and reverse repos are used in short-term borrowing and lending, often on an overnight basis between banks. Central banks including the Federal Reserve use reverse repos to add money to the money supply via its open market operations (OMOs) . Well, as Cassius points out, as the Fed unwinds its balance sheet and starts selling U.S. Treasuries in September, things could get a lot riskier in the capital markets , especially if we’re headed into a recession .

You see, the Fed’s reverse repurchase facility, RRP as it’s known—that’s its mechanism for buying government bonds—it’s attracted a wide array of investors helping mop up excess liquidity in the financial system. Led by money market funds , volume at the reverse repo window has topped $2 trillion for 39 straight days—that is a lot! Since the Fed raised rates by three quarters of a percent in July, the Fed is paying a record reverse repo rate of 2.3%. Investors are effectively taking deposits away from banks and putting them into government money market funds, which invest mainly in Treasurys and repos. These money funds, in turn funnel cash into the Fed’s overnight window, where other banks come to borrow every single day. Most investors, especially pure equity investors, don’t even know this is going on. But it is the steam engine of the American capital markets. The worry, as the Fed gets ready to sell $95 billion in government bonds come September 1, is that the outflow of deposits from banks and into money market funds could reduce bank reserves at a rapid pace that could hinder lending activities to the financial markets, and to the broader economy.

Filed Under: Uncategorized how to make money on the stock market, how to invest in stock market, stock market stocks, where do i go to invest in the stock market, stock market stock market, stock stock market, stock market market, stock market stock, going to the market, Go to the Market

How to tell a new bull from a bear market fakeout: Toss a coin

August 18, 2022 by economictimes.indiatimes.com Leave a Comment

Synopsis

Starting in mid-June, the S&P 500 is up 17%, erasing about half of its bear market plunge. Leuthold then looked at past rallies that broke out in bear markets, some of which fizzled and some of which became new bulls, at roughly the same point in their evolution.

You’ve consulted history, done the math and gathered the expert advice. Now, here’s really how to tell whether to go all-in on a stock rally that breaks out in the middle of a bear market: guess.

That sobering view is from data compiled by Leuthold Group, which sought ways to distinguish real rallies from fake ones by plotting prices in two dozen lookalike stock runups going back 65 years. The answer is that it remains next to impossible to say in real time which ones will last. Methods people claim work often fall apart when looked at rigorously.

This type of forecasting, in which past precedent is tested and tortured for trading insight, has become Wall Street ’s chief pastime of late, with a $7 trillion rebound in US equities tempting people to dive back in. Leuthold’s research suggests much of it is an iffy experiment in pattern recognition that provides grist for discussion but rarely reveals truths.

“I don’t know anyone who really calls the exact bottom consistently,” said Jeffrey Hirsch, chief editor of the “Stock Trader’s Almanac.” “There’s an old joke out there that there’s only one kind of person that calls it exact bottom and top. That’s a liar.”

In testing the view, Leuthold, the Minneapolis-based fund manager, did what a lot of researchers are doing nowadays — compare the current advance in stocks with previous ones to see if anything can be gleaned about its sustainability.

Starting in mid-June, the S&P 500 is up 17%, erasing about half of its bear market plunge. Leuthold then looked at past rallies that broke out in bear markets, some of which fizzled and some of which became new bulls, at roughly the same point in their evolution. At the two-month threshold, the rallies that faded were a little smaller, with a median gain of 11%, and the ones that kept going were a little faster, taking just seven days to get to 10% (the current one needed 31).

In the end, though, not much in terms of speed or trajectory separated the winners from the false dawns. Drawing a conclusion based on this brand of price action alone is only marginally better than a tossing a coin, says Doug Ramsey, the firm’s chief investment officer.

“The kickoff of a new bull market is a little more powerful, but there are enough exceptions to the rule in terms of the market meandering a bit before getting into that 10% threshold or very sharp bear market rallies that are achieved in just a handful of days,” he said. “You just can’t conclusively look at price action alone to say, ‘No, this is a bear market rally. No, this is a new bull market.’”

The futility rests not just with statistics but psychology and language. When does a rally qualify as being more than just a head fake? Years into the stock advance that began in 2009, it was possible to find people still describing it as a bear market rally — right up until it ended, in some cases. Things in markets aren’t clear until they’re put in history books, and in some cases not even then.

Forecasting the market is never easy, and this year is no different, given the uncertain path of Federal Reserve tightening and its impact on the economy. The backdrop has led to clashing views on the S&P 500, with the gap in strategists’ highest and lowest year-end target sitting among the widest on record.

Seeking guidance from charts is a fraught enterprise. In every blueprint that appears to contain insights, there’s either holes or one that contradicts it. Take the popular 50% retracement indicator, which states that once the S&P 500 recovers half its peak-to-trough decline — a milestone it achieved Friday — the index has almost always avoided making new lows.

That’s nice, except that a different gauge kept by Bank of America Corp., one that combines the S&P 500 price-earnings ratio with US consumer inflation, is adamant that stocks have yet to bottom. Every market trough since the 1950s saw the measure fall below 20. During the selloff this year, it only got as low as 27. The model has “a perfect track record,” BofA says.

With the Nasdaq Composite extending its rally from the June nadir past 20% and the S&P 500 fast approaching that threshold, one that loosely denotes a bull market, an argument is sometimes proffered that momentum alone is a case for getting back in. But Michael Burry, an investor who is best known for betting against the housing market ahead of the 2008 crash, noted last week in a tweet that during the bursting of the internet bubble, the Nasdaq jumped 20% at seven different times as it fell 78% to a 2002 low.

The same also rang true in 2008, when the S&P 500’s drawdown was interrupted by two separate bounces of 20%.

The randomness of it all isn’t lost on Ed Yardeni, president of his namesake research firm who nailed the market bottom in 1982 and 2009. Back in June, investor pessimism by some measure reached levels not seen since early 2009, a contrarian indicator that he said set the stage for a recovery.

One quirky fact that helped build his case: the S&P 500’s close to 3,666.77 at June’s trough is exactly 3,000 points above the intraday low of 666.79 that marked the onset of the 2009 bull market.

Dubbed his “666 indicator,” the market veteran has found this number sometimes showing up in his life in the midst of market turmoil, as if, he said, to give him a hint to stick to his long-held bullish stance. It happened in January 2016, when he checked in to a Zurich Hotel and was assigned room 666. The following month, the S&P 500 stemmed a 13% drop.

“It’s important to have a little bit of a sense of humor in this business, and I thought it was kind of fun,” Yardeni said. “You have to take a fairly diversified approach to try to forecast the stock market . Doing it just with one kind of discipline isn’t enough.”

Print Edition
Print Edition Thursday, 18 Aug, 2022

Experience Your Economic Times Newspaper, The Digital Way!

Read Complete Print Edition »

  • Front Page
  • Pure Politics
  • Companies
  • ET Markets
  • More

    IDBI Bank Stake Sale: TPG, Carlyle, Fairfax Tapped IDBI Bank Stake Sale: TPG, Carlyle, Fairfax Tapped

    The Centre is learnt to have reached out to global buyout funds and financial institutions, such as the Carlyle Group, TPG Capital and Prem Watsa-controlled Fairfax Holdings, to gauge investor interest in buying majority stakes held directly by the government and Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) in the bailed-out lender, investment banking and private equity executives familiar with the matter told ET.

    Govt has Moral Duty to Give Best Deal to Citizens: Jaishankar Govt has Moral Duty to Give Best Deal to Citizens: Jaishankar

    External affairs minister S Jaishankar has defended India’s decision to buy Russian oil by emphasising that the government has a moral duty to provide the best deal for the country’s citizens.

    Credit Scheme gets ₹50kcr Push; Govt Support for Farm Loans Credit Scheme gets ₹50kcr Push; Govt Support for Farm Loans

    The Cabinet on Wednesday approved a ₹50,000-crore increase in the limit for the Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) to ensure low-cost credit to hospitality and related segments hit hard by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Read More News on

US stock market federal reserve stock market S&P 500 Wall Street

(What’s moving Sensex and Nifty Track latest market news , stock tips and expert advice on ETMarkets . Also, ETMarkets.com is now on Telegram. For fastest news alerts on financial markets, investment strategies and stocks alerts, subscribe to our Telegram feeds .)

Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.

… more less

Pick the best stocks for yourself
Powered by

  • Check out which Nifty50 stocks analysts recommend buying this week
    Check out which Nifty50 stocks analysts recommend buying this week

    4 mins read

  • Bank stocks that can rally at least 20% in the near term
    Bank stocks that can rally at least 20% in the near term

    3 mins read

  • Check out which Nifty50 stocks analysts recommend buying this week
    Check out which Nifty50 stocks analysts recommend buying this week

    6 mins read

  • Midcap stocks with high upside potential: Stock Reports Plus
    Midcap stocks with high upside potential: Stock Reports Plus

    4 mins read

  • Bank stocks having more than 20% upside potential according to analysts
    Bank stocks having more than 20% upside potential according to analysts

    3 mins read

  • Check out which Nifty50 stocks analysts recommend buying this week
    Check out which Nifty50 stocks analysts recommend buying this week

    5 mins read

  • 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and upside potential of up to 41%
    5 stocks with consistent score improvement and upside potential of up to 41%

    5 mins read

  • Weekly Top Picks: Stocks that scored 10 on 10 on Stock Reports Plus
    Weekly Top Picks: Stocks that scored 10 on 10 on Stock Reports Plus

    8 mins read

  • View
    More Stories

Filed Under: Uncategorized US stock market, federal reserve, stock market, S&P 500, Wall Street, federal..., bull street market, bull street market durham, bull street market charleston, bull street market durham nc, why does referee toss coin, bull bear, what bull and bear market, toss coin online, 49ers toss coin, ra 9184 toss coin

As Nifty rallies 9%, MFs trim stakes in 3 of every 5 index stocks in July

August 18, 2022 by economictimes.indiatimes.com Leave a Comment

Synopsis

Data showed mutual funds cut stakes in 29 of 50 index constituents, with JSW Steel, Wipro, Bajaj Auto and Tata Steel among stocks on their sell radars. HDFC Life Insurance, Tata Motors, Maruti Suzuki, UPL and ONGC were, on the other hand, stocks where they bought additional stakes during the month.

Mutual funds trimmed stakes in three of every five Nifty50 stocks in July, the month that saw the NSE barometer rallying 9 per cent.

Data showed mutual funds cut stakes in 29 of 50 index constituents, with JSW Steel, Wipro,

Bajaj Auto

and Tata Steel among stocks on their sell radars.

HDFC Life Insurance

,

Tata Motors

,

Maruti Suzuki

, UPL and ONGC were, on the other hand, stocks where they bought additional stakes during the month.

The 50-pack index had bounced back in July, after three consecutive months of decline. The index was up 8.7 per cent for the month. This was the highest monthly gain for the index since December 2020.

Smart Talk
ETMarkets Smart Talk: Market could underperform in August-September, says this expert who follows Buffett style of investing

Stocks they sold
In JSW Steel, mutual decreased the number of shares held by 7.1 per cent month-on-month (MoM) to 4.82 crores, which were worth Rs 3,040 crore as of July end. In value terms, MF holding of the stock, however, increased 3.6 per cent MoM, as the scrip was up 11.75 per cent for the month A total of 19 funds own this stock, with 18 of them having less than 2 per cent stake in the steel maker.

In case of Wipro, mutual funds cut the number of shares held by 6.8 per cent to 16.69 crores. In value terms, MF holding in the stock fell 5.1 per cent to Rs 7,070 crore. A total of 19 mutual funds own less than a 2 per cent stake in the IT firm.

Bajaj Auto (down 5.7 per cent), Tata Steel (down 5.3 per cent),

Bajaj Finserv

(down 5.2 per cent), BPCL (down 5.1 per cent) and

Grasim Industries

(4.9 per cent) were some of the stocks where MF decreased the number of shares held by god percentage. That said, MF holding in Tata Steel, Bajaj Finserv, BPCL and Grasim increased in value terms.

SBI Life,

Hindalco Industries

,

Titan Company

, Dr Reddy’s Labs and ITC were some other stocks where MF holding fell in terms of the number of shares held. But due to the market rally, the value of MF holdings increased in SBI Life, Hindalco, Titan and ITC rose for the month.

Stocks they bought
In HDFC Life Insurance, mutual held increased the number of shares held by 8.8 per cent month-on-month (MoM) to 10.80 crore shares, which were worth Rs 6,000 crore as of July end. In value terms, MF holding of the stock increased 9.9 per cent MoM. A total of 19 funds own this stock, with 18 of them having less than a 2 per cent stake in the insurer.

In the case of Tata Motors, mutual funds increased the number of shares held by 6.9 per cent to 23.41 crore. In value terms, MF holding in the stock increased 16.7 per cent to Rs 10,530 crore. A total of 19 mutual funds own less than a 2 per cent stake in the automaker.

Maruti Suzuki (up 5.2 per cent), UPL (up 4.9 per cent), ONGC (up 3.7 per cent),

Apollo Hospitals

(up 3.6 per cent) and

Hero MotoCorp

(3.2 per cent) were some of the stocks where MF increased the number of shares held by 3-5 per cent. Except for ONGC, their holding in the rest four stocks also increased in value terms. ONGC stock was down 11.4 per cent for the month.

Kotak Mahindra Bank,

Reliance Industries

,

Britannia Industries

,

Tech Mahindra

and

Asian Paints

were a few other stocks, which saw MF buying in July.


(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times)

Print Edition
Print Edition Thursday, 18 Aug, 2022

Experience Your Economic Times Newspaper, The Digital Way!

Read Complete Print Edition »

  • Front Page
  • Pure Politics
  • Companies
  • ET Markets
  • More

    IDBI Bank Stake Sale: TPG, Carlyle, Fairfax Tapped IDBI Bank Stake Sale: TPG, Carlyle, Fairfax Tapped

    The Centre is learnt to have reached out to global buyout funds and financial institutions, such as the Carlyle Group, TPG Capital and Prem Watsa-controlled Fairfax Holdings, to gauge investor interest in buying majority stakes held directly by the government and Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) in the bailed-out lender, investment banking and private equity executives familiar with the matter told ET.

    Govt has Moral Duty to Give Best Deal to Citizens: Jaishankar Govt has Moral Duty to Give Best Deal to Citizens: Jaishankar

    External affairs minister S Jaishankar has defended India’s decision to buy Russian oil by emphasising that the government has a moral duty to provide the best deal for the country’s citizens.

    Credit Scheme gets ₹50kcr Push; Govt Support for Farm Loans Credit Scheme gets ₹50kcr Push; Govt Support for Farm Loans

    The Cabinet on Wednesday approved a ₹50,000-crore increase in the limit for the Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS) to ensure low-cost credit to hospitality and related segments hit hard by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Read More News on

nifty stocks nifty stocks mf sold nifty mutual funds nifty stocks mf bought britannia industries reliance industries hindalco industries kotak mahindra bank hdfc life insurance

(What’s moving Sensex and Nifty Track latest market news , stock tips and expert advice on ETMarkets . Also, ETMarkets.com is now on Telegram. For fastest news alerts on financial markets, investment strategies and stocks alerts, subscribe to our Telegram feeds .)

Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.

… more less

Pick the best stocks for yourself
Powered by

  • Check out which Nifty50 stocks analysts recommend buying this week
    Check out which Nifty50 stocks analysts recommend buying this week

    4 mins read

  • Bank stocks that can rally at least 20% in the near term
    Bank stocks that can rally at least 20% in the near term

    3 mins read

  • Check out which Nifty50 stocks analysts recommend buying this week
    Check out which Nifty50 stocks analysts recommend buying this week

    6 mins read

  • Midcap stocks with high upside potential: Stock Reports Plus
    Midcap stocks with high upside potential: Stock Reports Plus

    4 mins read

  • Bank stocks having more than 20% upside potential according to analysts
    Bank stocks having more than 20% upside potential according to analysts

    3 mins read

  • Check out which Nifty50 stocks analysts recommend buying this week
    Check out which Nifty50 stocks analysts recommend buying this week

    5 mins read

  • 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and upside potential of up to 41%
    5 stocks with consistent score improvement and upside potential of up to 41%

    5 mins read

  • Weekly Top Picks: Stocks that scored 10 on 10 on Stock Reports Plus
    Weekly Top Picks: Stocks that scored 10 on 10 on Stock Reports Plus

    8 mins read

  • View
    More Stories

Filed Under: Uncategorized nifty stocks, nifty stocks mf sold, nifty, mutual funds, nifty stocks mf bought, britannia industries, reliance industries, hindalco industries, kotak mahindra..., nifty index stocks, tamiya r/c vw beetle rally mf-01x model kit, stake free stock, staking boeren 5 juli, staking boeren 6 juli, staking boeren 6 juli 2021, staking boeren 8 juli, staking boeren 7 juli 2021, stake in stock, stakes vs stocks

Market slumps over slides in agricultural stocks

August 18, 2022 by bizhub.vn Leave a Comment

An HAGL Agrico’s farm. HNG was one of the stocks behind the market’s fall on Thursday. — Photo baochinhphu.vn

The market closed lower on Thursday as strong selling forces depressed indices.

On the Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange (HoSE), the VN-Index started off the afternoon with a steady rise. It hit a peak at around 2pm and then fell off to the baseline.

The index rose again at 2:15pm and reached half the previous peak. It held steady for about 15 minutes and suddenly suffered a free fall in the last minutes to 1,273.66 points, roughly 1.62 points (0.13 per cent) below the baseline.

The southern exchange was overrun by decliners whose number reached 243. Advancers’ head count, meanwhile, was just 94. Three stocks hit ceiling prices whereas two sat at the other end.

Thursday was a busy day for HoSE as investors traded 558 million shares on the exchange, equivalent to about VND14 trillion (US$600 million).

The VN30-Index echoed the VN-Index pattern but with a slighter loss. It lost just 0.47 points (0.04 per cent) to reach 1,299.93 points. In the basket, 11 stocks climbed, four stayed flat and 15 slid.

No Va Land (NVL) was leading the market’s fall with a loss of 1.54 per cent. Other stocks behind the bearish trend include BIDV (BID), VietinBank (CTG), Investment and Industrial Development (BCM) and Vinhomes (VHM).

Agricultural firms were the main catalyst for the slump with a sector-wide drop of 1.76 per cent. In the sector, Hoang Anh Gia Lai Agricultural JSC (HNG) lost 2.68 per cent, followed by Hoang Anh Gia Lai JSC (HAG) and Sao Mai Group (ASM).

E-Equipment was the next sector contributing to the slump as it ended lower over slides in GELEX Group (GEX) and SAM Holdings (SAM). Rangdong (RAL) was a bright spot with a slight rise of 0.3 per cent.

The trio stocks of the Vin family – Vingroup (VIC), Vincom (VRE) and Vinhomes (VHM) – saw mixed results. The first gained 1.19 per cent, the second 0.34 per cent, whereas the last lost 0.33 per cent. Overall, the realty sector declined by 0.51 per cent.

“Realty firms are coming under pressure from the governmental restrictions on credit room and the gloomy outlook of the corporate bond market,” said a securities expert.

The banking sector also saw lots of red on the screen. Big decliners include BIDV (BID), VietinBank (CTG), Techcombank (TCB) and VPBank (VPB). About four names gained points but they were outnumbered by decliners, resulting in a sector-wide fall of 0.36 per cent.

The HNX-Index on the Ha Noi Stock Exchange (HNX) lost 1.4 points (0.46 per cent) to reach 301.19 points.

Foreign investors poured money into the market by net-purchasing a total of around VND134.74 billion worth of shares on the two exchanges. Of which, they net bought VND120.56 billion on HoSE and VND14.18 billion on HNX. — VNS

Filed Under: Uncategorized agricultural stocks, HNX-Index, Ha Noi Stock Exchange, Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange (HoSE), the VN-Index, Markets, Ha Noi..., ghanshyam yadav stock market

Copyright © 2022 Search. Power by Wordpress.
Home - About Us - Contact Us - Disclaimers - DMCA - Privacy Policy - Submit your story