• Skip to main content

Search

Just another WordPress site

Case reports in medicine

Psaki: Republican Election Integrity Laws ‘The Worst Challenge To Our Democracy Since The Civil War’ | The Daily Wire

July 12, 2021 by www.dailywire.com Leave a Comment

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said on Monday that laws designed to increase election integrity and security represent “the worst challenge to our democracy since the Civil War.”

Psaki made the remarks when asked by a reporter at the White House press briefing about what the administration’s strategy was to combat efforts by Republican lawmakers around to secure elections.

“He’ll lay out the moral case for why denying the right to vote is a form of suppression and a form of silencing and how he will use, he will redouble his commitment to using every tool at his disposal to continue to fight to protect the fundamental rights of Americans to vote against the onslaught of voter suppression laws,” Psaki claimed, adding that Biden would highlight that the last election was certified after judges threw out multiple lawsuits.

“He’ll also decry efforts to strip the right to vote as authoritarian and anti-American and stand up against the notion that politicians should be allowed to choose their voters or to subvert our system by replacing independent election authorities with partisan ones,” Psaki claimed. “And he will highlight the work of the administration against this, the necessity of passing the For The People Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act and how we need to work together with civil rights organizations to build as broad a turnout and voter education system to overcome the worst challenge to our democracy since the Civil War.”

WATCH:

. @PressSec says the “onslaught of voter suppression laws” in red states are “the worst challenge to our democracy since the Civil War.” pic.twitter.com/k1wzq3GWjv

— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) July 12, 2021

Psaki also faced numerous questions over the administration’s response to the pro-freedom protests happening in Cuba, which the administration blamed on the coronavirus pandemic.

The Daily Wire reported on Sunday:

Cubans took to the street in rarely seen demonstrations to protest the impoverished conditions of the island, their lack of freedom under the far-left Marxist regime, and did so while chanting “Liberty” and “Freedom” and waving an American flag.

Despite this, Julie Chung, Acting Assistant Secretary for U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs, said that the protests were centered around the coronavirus pandemic, a claim that sparked backlash.

“Peaceful protests are growing in #Cuba as the Cuban people exercise their right to peaceful assembly to express concern about rising COVID cases/deaths & medicine shortages,” Chung tweeted. “We commend the numerous efforts of the Cuban people mobilizing donations to help neighbors in need.”

Fox News reporter Peter Doocy asked Psaki during Monday’s press briefing about the matter, to which Psaki responded by claiming: “Well, I would say first, that the protests were just happening yesterday, we’re still assessing what is motivating and, of course, in driving all of the individuals who came to the streets, but we know that when we say exhaustion, the, the, um, the, uh, the manner by which the people of Cuba are governed, that can cover a range of issues, whether it’s economic suppression, media suppression, lack of access to health and medical supplies, including vaccines. There are a range of reasons and voices we’re hearing from people on the ground who are protesting.”

“So, when these protesters are yelling ‘freedom’ and ‘enough’ there are people within the administration who think they’re saying freedom from rising COVID cases?” Doocy pressed.

“Again, I would say that when people are out there in the streets protesting and complaining about the lack of access to economic prosperity, to the medical supplies they need, to a life they deserve to live, that can take on a range of meanings,” Psaki claimed. “There’s a global pandemic right now. Most people in that country don’t have access to vaccines. That certainly is something we’d love to help with.”

Filed Under: News leftist tears mug daily wire, republican election results, republicans spanish civil war, leftist tears daily wire, daily wire bias, challenges democracy, democracy now war and peace report, republicans election, republicans elections, democracy at war

Supreme Court’s abortion ruling sets off new court fights

June 27, 2022 by www.sfchronicle.com Leave a Comment

This is a carousel. Use Next and Previous buttons to navigate

11

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — The fall of Roe v. Wade shifted the battleground over abortion to courthouses around the country Monday, as one side sought quickly to enact statewide bans and the other tried to block or at least delay such measures.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Friday to end constitutional protection for abortion opened the gates for a wave of litigation from all sides.

Many of the court cases will focus on “trigger laws,” adopted in 13 states in anticipation of the ruling and designed to take effect swiftly. Lawsuits could also target old anti-abortion laws that were left on the book and went unenforced under Roe. Newer abortion restrictions that were put on hold pending the Supreme Court ruling have also started to come back into play.

“We’ll be back in court tomorrow and the next day and the next day,” Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which argued the case that resulted in the high court ruling, said Friday.

On Monday, abortion rights advocates asked a Florida judge to block a new state law that bans abortions after 15 weeks with some exceptions and is set to take effect this week. Attorneys hoping to stave off a prohibition on abortion in Louisiana filed a lawsuit arguing state laws are unclear on when a ban can take effect and what constitutes an exception.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona and an abortion-rights group filed an emergency motion Saturday seeking to block a 2021 law they worry can be used to halt all abortions. Planned Parenthood in Utah has challenged a trigger law with narrow exceptions.

Brigitte Amiri, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Reproductive Freedom Project, said the organization is looking at “all options” to protect access to abortion.

As of Saturday, abortion services had stopped in at least 11 states — either because of state laws or confusion over them.

In some cases, the lawsuits may only buy time. Even if courts block some bans or restrictions from taking hold, lawmakers in many conservative states could move quickly to address any flaws cited.

That’s likely to be the case in Louisiana. The state’s Republican attorney genera took to Twitter on Friday to say bans with “trigger” provisions passed in anticipation of the ruling were immediately in effect. The only three clinics providing abortions in the state closed that day.

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit filed Monday in state court in New Orleans — including one of those clinics — don’t deny that Louisiana can now ban abortion. Instead, they contend Louisiana now has multiple, conflicting trigger mechanisms in the law.

They also argue that state law is unclear on whether it bans an abortion prior to a fertilized egg implanting in the uterus. And while the law provides an exception for “medically futile” pregnancies — in cases of fetuses with lethal abnormalities — the plaintiffs noted the law gives no definition of the term.

Around the country, challenges to other trigger laws could be made on the grounds that the conditions to impose the bans have not been met, or that it was improper for a past legislature to bind the current one.

Laura Herner, a professor at Mitchell Hamline School of Law in St. Paul, Minnesota, said other challenges might call into question whether state laws sufficiently and clearly allow for exceptions to protect the life or health of a pregnant woman.

Now that the high court has ruled that the U.S. Constitution does not guarantee the right to an abortion, abortion rights supporters will make the case that state constitutions protect such a right.

A judge heard arguments on that issue Monday in Florida, where attorneys sought an emergency injunction to stop a new law from going into effect Friday. The ban beyond 15 weeks has exceptions to save the pregnant woman’s life or prevent physical harm or in cases where the fetus has a fatal abnormality. The ACLU of Florida has argued it violates the Florida Constitution.

In a lawsuit filed by a Jewish congregation in Florida, arguments over religious liberty and the separation of church and state will come into play.

Still other cases could be filed as states try to sort out whether abortion bans in place before Roe was decided — sometimes referred to as “zombie laws” — apply now that there is no federal protection for abortion.

For instance, Wisconsin passed a law in 1849 banning abortions except to save the life of the mother. Attorney General Josh Kaul, a Democrat, said he does not believe it’s enforceable. Abortion opponents have called on lawmakers to impose a new ban.

In the meantime, Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin said it immediately suspended all abortions, though the district attorneys in Madison and Milwaukee have both suggested that they would not enforce the ban.

In Michigan, Planned Parenthood challenged a 1931 abortion ban ahead of last week’s Supreme Court ruling. In May, a judge said the ban could not be enforced because it violates the state’s constitution. Abortion rights supporters are now trying to get a proposed state constitutional amendment on the ballot in November to protect abortion and birth control.

Idaho, Oklahoma and Texas have adopted laws that allow people to seek bounties against those who help others get abortions. It is an open question as to whether that means people can be pursued across state lines, and legal challenges over those issues are likely to come up in cases of both surgical abortions and those using medicine mailed to patients.

The California Legislature, controlled by Democrats, passed a bill Thursday to shield abortion providers and volunteers in the state from civil judgments imposed by other states. In liberal Massachusetts, Gov. Charlie Baker, a Republican, signed an executive order Friday that prohibits state agencies from assisting other states’ investigations into anyone who receives a legal abortion in Massachusetts.

The challenge filed in Arizona, where most providers stopped offering abortions, said the legal questions are urgent.

Even if abortions resume in weeks or months, the plaintiffs said, “patients may be at greater risk of medical complications or may lose access to abortion altogether as a result of the delay.”

___

Forliti reported from Minneapolis and Mulvihill from Cherry Hill, New Jersey. Associated Press writers Anthony Izaguirre in Tallahassee, Florida; Scott Bauer in Madison, Wisconsin; Kate Brumback in Atlanta; Steve LeBlanc in Boston and Don Thompson in Sacramento, California, contributed to this report.

___

For AP’s full coverage of the Supreme Court ruling on abortion, go to https://apnews.com/hub/abortion .

Filed Under: Uncategorized Charlie Baker, Nancy Northup, Brigitte Amiri, POLITICIAN PERSON, Josh Kaul, Laura Herner, Democrat, Anthony Izaguirre, Mulvihill, Don Thompson, Scott Bauer, ..., ruling supreme court, rulings of the supreme court, latest rulings of supreme court, rulings supreme court, supreme court rulings today, gay marriage ruling supreme court, abortion supreme court, ruling of supreme court, rulings of supreme court, obamacare supreme court ruling

UPSC ethics simplified: abortion rights vs ethics

June 26, 2022 by indianexpress.com Leave a Comment

In 1973, in a historic judgment in the Roe vs Wade case , the US Supreme Court made abortion legal everywhere in the country. Now, that decision has been overturned by the Supreme Court, paving the way for states to outlaw abortions.

What is the abortion rate among women in the U.S.? How has it changed over time?

According to the Guttmacher Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there was a slight rise in the number of abortions in the latter part of the 2010s despite the general trend showing a decline since 1981 when the abortions rate was 29.3 per 1,000 women aged 15 to 44. According to the Guttmacher Institute, there were 13.5 abortions for every 1,000 women aged 15 to 44 in 2017 and it rose to 14.4 in 2020. It rose from 11.2 in 2017 to 11.4 in 2019, according to the CDC.

Rights vs Ethics

From an ethical standpoint, the debate over pregnancy termination is between a woman’s right over her body and the foetus’s right to life. Judith Jarvis Thomson, an American philosopher, advocated for the supremacy of a woman’s right over her body as a premise of freedom. She argued that one cannot force a woman to bear a child in her womb and give birth to a child if she does not want to do so for various reasons. Thomson said that the timing of the abortion is a key difference. She emphasised that for those who support abortion, the foetus is not a live human being during the period of conception or in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy.

According to feminist and psychologist Carol Gilligan, when deciding to terminate a pregnancy voluntarily, a woman faces a true “moral dilemma” or “moral conflict,” because such a decision frequently takes into account human relationships, the possibility of not hurting others, and responsibility towards others.

Best of Express Premium
Fresh FIR against RB Sreekumar, Sanjiv Bhatt and Teesta Setalvad based on…

After Moosewala’s murder, spotlight back on (Punjabi) gangs of Canada

IAS officer son death: The discrepancies

Newsmaker | Among first to take up cause of Gujarat riot victims, Teesta …

More Premium Stories >>

Don’t miss | UPSC ethics simplified: Politics plus or minus ethics

Pro-life versus pro-choice dilemma

According to ‘The Ethical Dilemma of Abortion’ by Journal of Student Research at Indiana University East, the pro-life versus pro-choice dilemma is one of the longest debated issues in the United States today, causing ethical tensions. This complex quandary continues to perplex biomedical ethicists because it is intertwined with normative assessment, politics, law, medicine, religion, and ethics.

The pro-life or anti-abortion argument is based on three principles: the Human Rights Principle, the Mens Rea Principle, and the Harm Principle. According to the Mens Rea Principle, “the agent’s intentions should be given weight.” Thus, abortion violates this principle because the agent intentionally kills another, and the pregnancy is terminated deliberately and knowingly. Abortion violates the Harm Principle, which states that “no one should inflict serious harm on other people.”

Abortions, according to the absolutist pro-choice position, are ethically justifiable and, as a result, should be performed as long as the procedure is safe. The pro-choice argument states that the woman should be free to make her own decisions as an individual, and these decisions are considered self-regarding because the foetus is only a potential person, not the ‘other’ as the pro-life argument holds.

ALSO READ | UPSC ethics simplified: From ‘babus’ to ‘civil servants’

Ethical approaches to abortion

Bioethics contends that ethical approaches to abortion frequently invoke four principles.

• Respect for patients’ autonomy

• Nonmaleficence (do no harm)

• Beneficence (beneficial care) and

• Justice

The Code of Medical Ethics of the American Medical Association recognises a patient’s right to “receive information and ask questions about recommended treatments” in order to “make well-considered decisions about care.” Respect for autonomy is enshrined in laws governing informed consent, which protects patients’ right to be informed about their medical options and to make an informed voluntary decision. Respect for autonomy, according to some bioethicists, lends firm support to the right to choose abortion, arguing that if a pregnant person wishes to end their pregnancy, the state should not interfere. One interpretation of this view holds that the principle of autonomy means that a person owns their body and should be free to decide what happens in and to it.

Ethical dilemmas before policymakers

The US Supreme Court decision has opened Pandora’s box for policymakers. It will result in unsafe abortions, harming women’s health and increased maternal mortality. Another major question is how a policy will be framed in exceptional cases such as sexual assault and congenital anomalies discovered late in the pregnancy.

According to experts, prohibiting or restricting abortion services does not eliminate the need for abortion. Instead of limiting abortion rates, restricting abortion access raises the risk of unsafe procedures and creates the risk of enacting criminal laws that require people to report or be prosecuted for suspected abortions. These dangers disproportionately affect people who are poor or face systemic discrimination. It is critical at this point for policymakers to be clear and leave no room for doubt.

Get an e-paper subscription via our special offer – click here

For any queries and feedback, you can contact [email protected] indianexpress.com Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Updates.

Express Subscription Do not hit the wall, subscribe for the best coverage out of India starting at just $5 per month

Filed Under: Uncategorized roe v wade, abortion rights, upsc ethics, upsc abortion debates, upsc roe v wade, upsc news, upsc, Ethics, Pro Choice, Pro life, Ethics Simplified, ..., right vs entitlement legal, ethics upsc notes, ethics toppers notes upsc, unalienable rights vs natural rights, unalienable rights vs legal rights, ethics with abortion, right vs left bundle branch block, ethical abortion, simplified whole life vs universal life, professional ethics vs personal ethics

TikTok forensics expert uses own blood to show how murders are solved

June 27, 2022 by www.newsweek.com Leave a Comment

A crime scene investigator — who has worked on over 3,000 deaths — uses his own blood on social media to teach the world how to approach the job.

Jeffrey Gentry, 40, is a certified bloodstain pattern analyst and death investigator, who spends his days inspecting blood splatter at real-life crime scenes.

In his downtime, Jeffrey utilizes social media and online classes to teach others about his passion.

He is one of only 60 International Association for Identification (IAI) certified bloodstain pattern analysts in the world.

Jeffrey’s professional history also includes roles as an ABMDI certified Deputy Coroner death investigator, forensic toxicology analyst and forensic autopsy technician.

He has investigated, and prepared reports for, over 3,000 deaths over his career, including murders, motor vehicle accidents, overdoses and suicides.

Hailing from Fresno, California, Jeffrey began his journey in death investigation in 2005, when he began working as a mortician’s assistant.

Jeffrey has a science background, with a Bachelor’s Degree in biochemistry and molecular biology and associate degrees in life science, mathematics and liberal arts.

He believes his background in science, combined with his investigative experience, made him perfect for the notoriously-difficult career as a bloodstain pattern analyst.

Jeffrey said: “When I was younger I was always interested in medicine, science and all things unique and morbid.

“While raising my son alone and supporting myself through college, I developed an interest in forensic science.

“Years ago, a college professor and colleague suggested that I look into bloodstain pattern analysis.

“I worked very hard to meet the requirements of a certified bloodstain pattern analyst.

“When I did, I applied and became certified…the rest is history!”

The requirements for becoming an IAI certified analyst include a hard science background, strict training requirements and extensive scene and investigative experience.

Jeffrey has a passion for blood analysis and crime scene investigation – his certifications are independent of his degree and work, and were self-funded and on his own time.

His training, education and certification cost him thousands of dollars of his own money.

He said: “I agree with the tough bloodstain pattern analysis certification requirements – these strict requirements ensure the best standard of practice.

“My work is very rewarding and has allowed me the opportunity to travel and meet many wonderful and experienced investigators.

“Death investigation and forensics require dedication and personal sacrifice – you must set aside personal obligations and give full attention to the investigation.

“The work days can be long and present themselves at unexpected times. It is not uncommon to work on a case for 10 to 15 hours straight.

“Then, after you get some sleep, you go right back to working the case.

“You never know when you are going to get the next call and once you do, you must drop everything and respond.”

Jeffrey emphasized that, despite the stressful nature of his work, it can be so personally rewarding to provide a voice for those who no longer have that opportunity.

His work has also inspired him to begin teaching through the Death Investigation Training Academy, where he runs a four-hour, online blood pattern analysis course, geared toward crime scene investigators and law enforcement officers.

However, his course is available to all as he hopes that sharing his experiences will inspire the next generation of crime scene investigators.

Jeffrey decided that he would begin posting funny and educational content on social media with the hopes of providing the younger generation of true crime followers with access to reliable and educational content.

He started posting videos on YouTube, Facebook and – his favorite – TikTok in November 2021, where he has since amassed an audience of over 80,000 followers.

Jeffrey added: “Before November, I did not have a single social media account.

“The hardest part is creating educational content in a way that keeps people’s attention.

“I do many of my blood experiments at my own home so it is really funny when people come over to visit.

“My house, bathroom, garage and driveway, have all been covered in blood!”

Jeffrey, his wife and his three kids enjoy watching videos together to get new ideas and to follow the latest trends.

His videos use a simple, practical approach to show the various tools and methods that he uses to identify blood stains and patterns.

He also likes to use his daughter’s Barbie dolls to recreate crime scenes and display how different patterns can be created.

Jeffrey hopes his videos may one day inspire a young person to pursue a career in forensic science, investigations or even bloodstain pattern analysis.

He said: “Teaching inspired me to post information about what I do online.

“I try to keep it normal and humorous so people can watch the videos and learn the science stuff without needing to pay or access higher education.

“I think it is great that people who watch my videos are learning something new without even realizing it!

“The comments are great – I even like the negative comments.

“They make me smile thinking that even though that person posted a negative comment they still watched my content and had to think to generate a reply.”

This story was provided to Newsweek by Zenger News .

Filed Under: Uncategorized News, Tiktok, Forensics, Blood, offbeat, agency:11, Forensic Science, forensic expert testimony, using logic to solve a problem, how to use blood vials in bloodborne, why normal curve is useful in problem solving, combating dependence explosion in forensic analysis using alternative tag propagation semantics, forensic expert role, most mysterious murders solved, unraveling the polygenic architecture of complex traits using blood eqtl meta analysis, of forensic experts, contributed knowledge to the forensic characterization of blood

David Bowie: ‘He fought like a lion’ Star’s 18-month battle with – hard to spot symptoms

June 27, 2022 by www.express.co.uk Leave a Comment

David Bowie performs Let’s Dance on US TV in 2002

Sign up for FREE health tips to live a long and happy life

Invalid email

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

The star passed away just two days after the release of his 26th studio album, Blackstar. Memorials for the star were created all across the world in the hours following his death, including in Brixton, London, the area where the singer was born. The Heroes singer’s death was made all the more shocking as he kept his liver cancer diagnosis from public knowledge, only telling his closest friends and family. The disease first affected the singer back in 2014 when Bowie turned up to the recording studio of his final album with no hair or eyebrows as a result of chemotherapy, then and there he swore everyone he worked with to secrecy.

Related articles

  • High cholesterol: The sensation in your foot signalling amputation
  • The vitamin supplement associated with a 40% higher risk of cancer

Things were starting to look up for the star as by mid-2015 he was in remission – but sadly, in November of that same year, the cancer returned and this time it was terminal, having spread around his body.

Prior to his death, Bowie had been working with director Ivo Van Hove on a new stage show titled Lazarus, which Bowie soon realised he would not be able to make the show’s debut in New York back in 2015.

Speaking about Bowie’s “courageous” battle with cancer shortly after his death, Hove said: “We began collaborating on our show Lazarus and at some point he took me to one side to say that he wouldn’t always be able to be there due to his illness. He told me he had cancer, liver cancer.

“The cast didn’t know all that time, and I suspect that the musicians with whom he recorded ‘Blackstar’ didn’t know either.

DON’T MISS: Supplements warning: Four supplements that may cause ‘potentially fatal’ heart arrhythmias

David Bowie

David Bowie: The star passed away back in 2016 (Image: Getty)

“He made every effort to complete those two projects on time, not to let his illness win.

“Bowie was still writing on his deathbed, you could say. He fought like a lion and kept working like a lion through it all. I had incredible respect for that.”

Bowie’s close friends, including actor Gary Oldman also commented on the star’s remarkable attitude towards fighting the disease. Revealing that Bowie used to joke about his appearance as his illness and the gruelling treatment caused him to lose a lot of weight.

Oldman shared: “He faced his illness with enormous courage, dignity, grace and customary humour – even in dire circumstances,” Gary said.

READ MORE:
Brushing teeth at a certain time of day is a ‘significant’ factor for longevity says study [TIPS]
Lady Louise Windsor health: Royal’s battle with ‘profound’ eye issue – symptoms [LATEST]
‘I’d started planning my funeral’ David Tennant’s wife Georgia on cancer battle [INSIGHT]
Waking up with a lump on your eyelid could be a ‘chalazion’ – signs and treatment [EXPERT ADVICE]

Trending

READ MORE

  • Half of Gen Z admit social media is only place they can be themselves

“When he wrote to tell me the bad news, he added, ‘The good news is I’ve got my cheekbones back.'”

Bowie remained optimistic throughout his treatment but even before battling cancer, in the years beforehand it was reported that he suffered from a whopping six heart attacks, some of which occurred when the star was out on tour.

In the 2018 documentary David Bowie: The Last Five Years, Bowie’s bandmates were seen recalling how the star had developed symptoms and was starting to “hunch” over when backstage.

“We finished the show and then it seemed like David was in a lot of pain, and obviously something was wrong,” guitarist Gerry Leonard recalled.

David Bowie

David Bowie: The star was having chemotherapy before he was told his cancer was terminal (Image: Getty)

READ MORE

  • ‘David Bowie isn’t who I fell in love with’ – Ziggy’s wife on romance

Liver cancer

The liver is the second largest organ in the body after your skin. It is situated below the right lung and is protected by the lower ribs on the right side of your body. Liver cancer develops when cells within the area start to divide and grow in an uncontrolled way.

Affecting around 6,200 people each year (17 new cases every day) it makes liver cancer one the the most prolific in the UK. What makes it even more of a concern is the fact that many individuals do not have any signs or symptoms in the early stages.

The NHS explains that symptoms of liver cancer can include the following:

  • Your skin or the whites of your eyes turn yellow (jaundice), you may also have itchy skin, darker pee and paler poo than usual
  • Loss of appetite or losing weight without trying to
  • Feeling tired or having no energy
  • Feeling generally unwell or having symptoms like flu
  • A lump in the right side of your tummy.

Others will find that they feel sick, have a pain at the top right side of their tummy or suffer from symptoms associated with indigestion which develop soon after eating.

Related articles

  • David Bowie’s son slams Russian network for using Space Oddity lyrics
  • Liver cancer: The sign in your stomach that could point to the disease

Lung cancer

Lung cancer: The condition affects around 6,200 people in the UK each year (Image: Getty)

Symptoms are similar for several different forms of liver cancer, the most common of which is known as secondary liver cancer, which tends to spread to other areas in the body apart from the lungs. Primary liver cancer is more uncommon.

Liver cancer is often treatable but tends to depend on various factors such as the type of cancer, the size, if it has spread and the location. If liver cancer is found early, is small and it has not spread, you may be able to have surgery to remove it.

Other forms of treatment include chemotherapy, radiotherapy and using targeted medicines which aims to stop the cancer from growing and kill cancer cells.

If an individual has advanced liver cancer it might be very hard to treat. It may not be possible to cure cancer. If this is the case, the aim of treatment will be to limit the cancer and its symptoms, and help you live longer.

Related articles

  • Fatty liver disease: Carbohydrates could be a trigger
  • Cancer: The supplement shown to be ‘as cancerous as cigarette smoke’
  • Mum’s heartburn was sign of ‘death sentence’ diagnosis
  • Liver cancer symptoms: The three signs around your food habits
  • Liver cancer signs: The ‘flu-like symptoms’ to spot

Filed Under: Uncategorized health, ctp_video, autoplay_video, David Bowie health, David Bowie liver cancer, David Bowie death, David..., flu like symptoms for 3 months, flu like symptoms for a month, autism 18 month old symptoms, what do 18 month olds like to do

Copyright © 2022 Search. Power by Wordpress.
Home - About Us - Contact Us - Disclaimers - DMCA - Privacy Policy - Submit your story