• Skip to main content

Search

Just another WordPress site

Newsletters

Money Saving Club newsletter – get budget tips from experts and top deals not to miss

March 20, 2023 by www.mirror.co.uk Leave a Comment

With the cost of living rising, it’s no surprise that keeping on top of your budget is a priority for millions of Brits.

Saving money and finding ways to cut prices on household bills are at the forefront of people’s minds – and that’s where the Money Saving Club is on hand to help.

Our Money Saving Club team has been putting together all the latest updates you need to know about when it comes to managing your budget.

That includes any big money updates and changes you need to know about such as price increases or government schemes launched to help families, as well as money saving experts’ tricks and hacks for keeping your costs down.

They even seek out some of the best deals and offers that are worth having on your radar – as well as the products and gadgets that people have been raving about when it comes to saving money.

You can sign up here to get the Money Saving Club’s latest tips and advice straight to your inbox.

You can expect the Money Saving Club’s top picks to drop in your inbox twice a month, to encompass any big news and updates as well as money experts’ tips, and more deals.

Filed Under: Money Save money, Money, money saving expert budget, broadband deals money saving expert, money saving and budgeting tips, money saving expert credit club, broadband best deals money saving expert, budget planner money saving expert, save budget money tips, money saving expert budget planner, budget money saving expert

The Cases Against Trump: A Guide

March 23, 2023 by www.theatlantic.com Leave a Comment

This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here.

If you’re finding it hard to keep track of all of former President Donald Trump’s legal woes, don’t feel bad: He can’t get it straight, either. Last weekend, he announced that he’d be arrested in Manhattan on Tuesday. It’s now Thursday, and Trump remains a free man, with no indictment from a grand jury yet . Public indications still seem to point toward charges against Trump in Manhattan, but what and when are still a mystery. And several more cases loom beyond that.

Assuming Trump is eventually charged, whether in Manhattan or elsewhere, the result will be a spectacle no one alive has seen before: a former U.S. president under arrest. We likely won’t see a classic perp walk, with officers holding him by each arm and escorting him. The process would instead be arranged and negotiated beforehand, and he’s reportedly been debating whether to smile for the cameras on his way to being booked. Trump would have to be fingerprinted like any other defendant, and then he’d be released. But that would be just the start of a long process toward a trial or plea, and then a verdict.

With so many investigations and cases floating around, maintaining a sense of the issues at stake in each investigation, the timeline for them, and how serious a threat to the former president they pose is tricky—even when you’ve been following the cases for years now, as I have . Here’s my attempt to put all of the open criminal cases against Donald Trump in context for easy reference. I’ve arranged the cases by my assessment of the seriousness of the allegations to democracy and the rule of law, from the least significant to the most.

Manhattan: Hush Money

Because District Attorney Alvin Bragg has not announced charges, we have to speculate a bit, but public evidence suggests that Bragg is looking at a claim that Trump falsified business records in reimbursing his former fixer Michael Cohen for a hush payment made to Stormy Daniels, an adult-film actor who allegedly had an affair with Trump. Cohen’s payoff and Trump’s reimbursement are not in dispute, but Trump denies the affair and any lawbreaking.

When? The timing of any charges is a topic of intense speculation, especially after Trump’s prediction last weekend of a Tuesday arrest. The grand jury unexpectedly didn’t meet yesterday and is reportedly meeting on a different matter today. That means we’re probably looking at next week at the earliest.

How grave is the allegation? Look, falsifying records is a crime, and crime is bad. But many people have analogized this case to Al Capone’s conviction on tax evasion: It’s not that he didn’t deserve it, but it wasn’t really why he was an infamous villain. Unless Bragg has a more elaborate case than he has tipped, this feels like a minor offense compared with the others I’ll get to below.

How plausible is conviction? The case Bragg is most likely to make faces hurdles, including the statute of limitations, a questionable key witness in Cohen, and some untested legal theories. In short, based on what we know, the Manhattan case seems like perhaps both the least significant and the legally weakest case. Even some Trump critics are dismayed that Bragg seems to be likely to bring charges before any other criminal case.

Department of Justice: Mar-a-Lago Documents

Special Counsel Jack Smith is overseeing a Justice Department probe into presidential records, some of them highly classified, found at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home. Trump removed many documents from the White House when he left office, then refused to return some despite repeated requests. His attorneys attested that he’d returned all relevant documents, but an August 2022 search turned up many, including extremely sensitive documents allegedly stored haphazardly.

When? Smith faces a de facto deadline of January 20, 2025, at which point Trump or any Republican president would likely shut down a case if they take office. Last week a court matter raised eyebrows , as prosecutors persuaded a judge to order Trump’s attorney to hand over documents, ruling that attorney-client privilege didn’t apply because evidence suggested that Trump’s attorneys may have advanced a crime. Then this week, Trump appealed, but the D.C. Circuit Court rejected the attempt in a lightning-fast decision.

How grave is the allegation? The alleged handling of the documents is not as serious as Trump’s attempts to overturn the election, but it’s probably a solid bronze medal on this list. The documents are highly sensitive for national security, and if allegations are true, Trump refused to comply with a subpoena, tried to hide documents, and lied to the government through his attorneys.

How plausible is conviction? This may be the most open-and-shut case. Not every case involving classified documents gets charged, but if Smith decides to prosecute, the facts and legal theory here are more straightforward than in almost any other of these matters.

Fulton County: Election Subversion

In Fulton County, Georgia, which includes most of Atlanta, District Attorney Fani Willis has been conducting an investigation into attempts to steal the 2020 presidential election in Georgia, including Trump’s call to Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, in which he pressured Raffensperger to “find 11,780 votes” to allow him to win.

When? A special grand jury completed its work in January and recommended that its report be made public. The special grand jury can make recommendations, but a normal grand jury would have to issue indictments. During a January hearing over whether to release the full report, prosecutors told a judge that decisions on charges were “imminent,” but so far nothing has emerged. (The judge withheld most of the report.)

How grave is the allegation? Short of the federal January 6 case (which I’ll get to next), this is probably the most egregious. Trump’s pressure offensive against officials at the state level to try and change the results of the election was a grave attack on democracy. But Willis can focus only on what happened in Georgia, one piece of the bigger whole.

How plausible is conviction? Experts differ. This is a huge case for a local prosecutor, even in a county as large as Fulton, to bring. The grand jury’s foreperson said in an interview that there will be no big surprises in who the jury suggested be charged. Willis has the advantage of the recording of the Raffensperger call, which is close to a smoking gun.

Department of Justice: January 6

Special Counsel Smith is overseeing the federal probes related to Trump’s attempt to subvert the 2020 election and overturn the results, as well as the insurrection on January 6, 2021.

When? No one knows. As with the other DOJ case, Smith needs to move quickly, before Trump or any other Republican president could shut down a case upon taking office in January 2025.

How grave is the allegation? This is the most important Trump case out there. You can’t get much graver than attempting to subvert the American election system and inciting an attack on Congress, and the Justice Department has the potential to address the whole sordid episode.

How plausible is conviction? It’s very hard to say. Everyone saw the attack, but we don’t know what crimes Smith might charge, or what legal theories he might use—the House January 6 committee, for example, made a nonbinding recommendation to apply a seldom-used charge of aiding insurrection—or whether he would even charge Trump or instead opt to prosecute lower-level officials.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Newsletters, grand jury, Lago DocumentsSpecial Counsel Jack Smith, start of a long process, deadline of January, District Attorney Fani Willis, ..., The Conservative Case for Trump, Trump University case

MIT professor reveals key to maintaining healthy brain function and averting dementia

March 23, 2023 by www.independent.co.uk Leave a Comment

Stay ahead of the trend in fashion and beyond with our free weekly Lifestyle Edit newsletter

Stay ahead of the trend in fashion and beyond with our free weekly Lifestyle Edit newsletter

Maintaining healthy brain function is no secret, an MIT professor and expert who focuses on diseases such as Alzheimer’s has said.

“People actually know what they should be doing” to preserve their memory, neuroscientist Li-Huei Tsai, who directs The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, said.

“I think that if you just keep a routine, you know, you do it,” Tsai told Insider. “I mean, I think that’s the only way to do it.”

“I think people actually know what they should be doing to stay healthy and to preserve their memory,” he pointed out.

Individuals with a healthier lifestyle had slower memory decline compared to those who did not, a British Medical Journal study that followed 30,000 people in China for 10 years recently revealed .

Recommended

  • A CDC warning and a fungus outbreak: Everything we know about the deadly candida auris
  • Watchdog calls for review of menopause link to poor mental health after woman’s suicide
  • ‘Fifth of UK hospitals cancelled operations’ during three days of 2022 heatwave

For the study, experts looked at habits such as whether people had a healthy diet, if they exercised regularly, whether they have regular social contact, how their cognitive activities are and if they abstained from smoking and alcohol.

Speaking of how she maintains her brain functions personally, Tsai said: “I just have to really discipline myself.”

“For instance, exercise in the winter: it’s really painful when you look at outside temperature below zero and there’s ice and snow on the ground. I just try to discipline myself.”

Earlier this month, the BMC Medicine journal published the findings of scientists who found the food types that can reduce chances of dementia by up to 23 per cent.

The findings are based on data from more than 60,000 individuals from the UK Biobank – an online database of medical and lifestyle records of more than half a million Britons.

“Our study suggests that eating a more Mediterranean-like diet could be one strategy to help individuals lower their risk of dementia ,” said Oliver Shannon, lecturer in human nutrition and ageing at Newcastle University.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Lifestyle, maintain healthy blood pressure, professors headquarters key, foods for healthy brain, foods for a healthy brain, food for healthy brain, how to maintain a healthy brain, healthy brain healthy body, how to maintain healthy blood sugar levels, how to maintain healthy bones, maintaining healthy bones

“No hope”: Ukraine lawmakers dismiss China peace talk after Putin-Xi meet

March 23, 2023 by www.newsweek.com Leave a Comment

Chinese leader Xi Jinping departed Moscow on Wednesday having flattered his “dear friend” Vladimir Putin with a high-profile state visit at an otherwise delicate moment for Russia’s president, whose campaign to make Kyiv bend the knee has run far over schedule.

Putin is now the first leader of a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council with an arrest warrant to his name for possible war crimes . For his troubles, his Chinese opposite number was received with a red carpet, brass brand, big flags, and small tables.

Xi’s strides into the Kremlin were effortless; China’s third-term president is comfortable with his reaffirmed political stature, confident in Beijing’s position on the international stage, and convinced of his decision to back Putin to the hilt. He even endorsed Putin’s electoral prospects before the Russian leader himself was ready to announce another run for the office he has held on and off for two decades.

Xi, who is expected to sit atop the Communist Party ‘s hierarchy for at least another five years, had described his three-day visit with Putin as “a journey of friendship, cooperation, and peace.” That was indeed the order of priorities, according to their public remarks.

Despite some early expectations that Xi would elevate the Chinese peace proposal for Ukraine, the yearlong war became something of an afterthought as the two leaders put on an unmistakable display of unity in the face of Western pressure. The talks did little to bolster Xi’s peacemaking credentials, Ukrainian lawmakers said.

“China is not interested in Ukraine winning the war and returning all its occupied territories. Victory for Ukraine would mean for China victory for democracy and the defeat of its strategic partner without limits. China will do everything to prevent it from happening,” Oleksandr Merezhko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament, told Newsweek .

“The China-Russia relationship is mature, stable, independent, and resilient,” said a Putin-Xi joint statement to cement their comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination for the new era, a title Beijing reserves exclusively for its quasi-alliance with Moscow. “Russia needs a prosperous and stable China, and China needs a strong and successful Russia.”

They again declared support for one another’s “core interests”—sovereignty, territorial integrity, security, and development. And “large-group talks” with Russian delegations led by cabinet-level officials resulted in a second joint statement on cooperation across national industries through 2030, China’s foreign ministry said in a readout.

Xi on Top

” China and Russia regard each other as priority partners for cooperation, always respect each other, and treat each other as equals, serving as a model for major power relations today,” Xi and Putin agreed.

At home, however, China’s leaders are cognizant of the Kremlin’s moment of relative vulnerability and the timeliness of their diplomatic relief. State media has presented Xi’s trip as having offered instruction and counsel to his Russian counterpart, according to independent scholar Philip Cunningham, author of the Substack newsletter China Story , which watches the carefully choreographed news programs of Chinese state broadcaster CCTV.

“The optics of the summit clearly favored Xi. Any talk of equal footing is just rhetorical,” Cunningham told Newsweek . “On CCTV, the meeting between the two mostly focuses on Xi talking. What surprised me most was not only that Putin can be seen dutifully taking notes, but CCTV repeats this abject clip about 10 times, as if Putin were just a schoolboy.”

“Xi,” said Cunningham, “never takes notes.”

Putin also committed to more market access for Chinese companies than was granted to Russian industry actors, according to Russia watchers who scrutinized the multi-year agreements covering energy, finance, trade, technology, agriculture, space, and more. The deals will increase Russia’s growing use of China’s yuan for export settlements, currency holdings, and securities exchanges amid restricted access to the dollar and euro.

“Russia’s economic isolation has created lucrative business opportunities for Chinese firms, many of which are state backed. Beijing remains keen to provide Moscow with a financial lifeline, so long as it can avoid eliciting a strong U.S. response in the process,” said Craig Singleton, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

“Perhaps most interesting is that China’s actions to date appear aimed at ensuring Russia has what it needs to sustain its wartime economy—not actually win the war,” Singleton told Newsweek .

“For its part, Russia can turn to few other countries to help bolster its economy—and Beijing knows it, which is why China will continue to extract lucrative concessions from Russia on a range of fronts,” he said. “Yet, China runs the real risk of being seen as taking advantage of Russia’s economic isolation for its own benefit, which could potentially aggravate long-standing tensions between Chinese and Russian elites.”

Beijing extracted meaningful political benefits, too. After a year of Chinese equivocation on Russia’s decision to puncture Europe’s long peace, Putin appears more willing than ever to back Xi’s own security concerns in Asia, which also happen to revolve around the postwar military posture of the United States and its regional allies.

Their joint statement, which identified America as the main antagonist, called for the withdrawal of nuclear weapons deployed overseas and warned of “the consequences and risks to regional strategic stability” associated with AUKUS, the agreement by the U.S. and U.K. to share nuclear-powered submarine technology with Australia.

“The two sides also express serious concern about NATO ‘s continued strengthening of military-security ties with Asia-Pacific countries, which undermines regional peace and stability,” said the Russian and Chinese leaders. “The two sides oppose the piecing together of closed and exclusive blocs in the region to manufacture bloc politics and camp confrontation.”

Putin’s Safest Bet

Russia ‘s ongoing invasion was beset with errors from the start: It overestimated the readiness of its own troops, underestimated Ukrainian resistance, and misread the West’s willing to inflict long-term economic pain, often at its own immediate expense. But amid a sea of miscalculations, Xi was Putin’s one good bet.

“When discussing topical international and regional problems, the president and I affirmed that Russia and China’s views on them are identical or very close,” Putin said of Xi. “We can see that the practice of applying illegitimate, politically biased sanctions and other restrictions, and the use of other means of unfair competition in the economic struggle , is expanding.”

Subject matter experts say it speaks to a growing convergence in the strategic outlook of the two capitals—a common goal to push back against the U.S.—while those who believe Moscow is unwittingly resigning itself to a lasting place in Beijing’s orbit may also be overlooking Putin’s conclusions about the potential trade-offs.

“Russia is in a full-scale war and an economic war—these are peculiar conditions. Russia is making various concessions on bilateral investment, and China is swinging in with a huge level of public diplomatic, financial and economic support for a war that Russia is increasingly framing in existential terms. That’s a pretty significant framework,” said Andrew Small, a senior fellow with the German Marshall Fund’s Indo-Pacific Program.

“The realities of the economic situation for Russia mean it is where it is. But that was the bet on the Russian side: They decided it was worth it to take actions that were going to lead to an extremely damaging confrontation with the West because they had China. They weren’t left with no alternative—they were left with a Chinese alternative ,” Small told Newsweek .

“It tilts the balance of power further in China’s favor, but Russia made a decision that it was better to accommodate the reality of growing Chinese power than to chafe against it,” he said. “This was untested territory to count on China in a drawn-out war under considerable pressure from the West. The visit is a striking public gesture of support in a moment of high sensitivity.”

For both countries, the precedent creates a set of mutual expectations that could see Moscow back Beijing in similar circumstances in the future, especially in a crisis involving Taiwan . But even then, questions about China and Russia in a formal alliance may be misplaced.

“The two sides noted that the China-Russia relationship is not the kind of military-political alliance of the Cold War, but transcends this model of state-to-state relations and is characterized by non-alliance, non-confrontation, and non-targeting of third countries,” said the joint statement, which described the deepening partnership as a “strategic choice” based on common interests.

“The model that China has in mind is flexible forms of mutual support that strengthen the hand of each party and can extend further to involve extremely deep military and intelligence cooperation, but which comes without obligations,” Small said. “Nothing needs to be put on paper; nothing needs to be formally agreed. It only needs understanding between the leaders.”

“Binary rhetoric about whether it is or isn’t an alliance misses all the gradations of how China is actually thinking about these partnerships and what the two sides actually need,” he said. “What did Russia need from China? They didn’t need a treaty commitment. They needed China to provide a financial, economic and political backstop for what Russia is doing. That’s what China is doing now for Russia.”

Kyiv’s Skeptics

The highly anticipated summit was light on details about the situation in Ukraine . Putin said Beijing’s vague peace proposal “correlates to the point of view of the Russian Federation,” and accused Kyiv and its Western partners of not being ready to negotiate.

Putin has acknowledged that a peace deal might be required to end the fighting, but has shown no indication of jettisoning his maximalist war goals that would leave Ukraine a rump puppet state in a Russian imperial sphere of influence . Putin’s troops are still on the attack, and Russian kamikaze drones again dived down on Kyiv as Xi wrapped up his sumptuous visit.

China’s blueprint calls for a cease-fire that would leave Russian troops in occupied Ukrainian territories—an outcome anathema to Kyiv —and an end to any sanctions on Moscow not approved by the U.N. Security Council, where both China and Russia have vetoes. It also expressed its opposition to nuclear war, encouraged dialogue and restraint without acknowledging Moscow’s aggression, and urged recognition of Russia’s “legitimate security interests and concerns.”

Despite the paucity of substance, Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has remained publicly open to discussions with Beijing about its peace plan. The president has so far only received the cold shoulder from Xi, but is wary of any falling-out with China— Ukraine’s largest trading partner before the war—that might push it deeper into the Kremlin’s corner, and perhaps open the door to direct military assistance for Russia.

“China is absolutely not neutral,” said Merezhko, who represents Zelensky’s Servant of the People party and chairs the parliament’s foreign affairs committee. “It conducts military exercises with Russia. It openly blames the West and NATO, not the actual aggressor. Russia and China are the core of a coalition waging hybrid war against democracy and undermining the rules-based order.”

“I didn’t expect much,” he said of Xi’s state visit. “Chinese bureaucracy is very slow. They will just repeat old propagandistic mantras about ‘peace.’ Maybe Xi will call our president but just to repeat earlier messages.”

As for Beijing’s peace proposal, Merezhko said it presented “no hope.”

Bohdan Yaremenko, also a member of the parliament’s foreign affairs committee, said that expectations were already low in Kyiv. “No one was anticipating anything of the Chinese,” he told Newsweek . “For a global superpower to take a year’s worth of time thinking about the situation and then to deliver what was delivered is very tragic.”

He expects continued, if limited, diplomatic activity. “I have no doubt that President Zelensky will talk to Xi,” he said. “But it’s just a reflection of our understanding that it’s better to have some contacts with China to be able to send them a signal that we really hope they will not change their policy in terms of supplying major military equipment to Russia.”

Ukrainian hopes that China could press Russia into abandoning its disastrous gambit appear to have been misguided, but many understand Zelensky’s abundance of caution . Officials in Kyiv can be expected to keep playing nice with Beijing to avoid the nightmare scenario of Chinese weapons on the battlefields of Ukraine.

“We should do everything in our power to prevent China from supplying weapons to Russia, and maybe we should recalibrate our thinking and think about realistic goals, even if we don’t like them,” said Inna Sovsun, a member of Ukraine’s parliament and the deputy head of the liberal Golos party.

“We have to think about the maximum we can achieve. Maybe the more realistic scenario is putting pressure on China, so that they will continue to say that they are neutral, and that they’re not supporting either side,” Sovsun told Newsweek .

Kyiv is far from the only capital in which China’s peace proposal has fallen flat. Officials in Washington—Ukraine’s strongest international backers in the war thus far—argue the document could have ended after the first point: respect for the U.N. Charter.

John Kirby, a senior spokesperson for the White House’s National Security Council, rejected Russia’s description of China as “objective and impartial.” “If China wants to play a constructive role here in this conflict, then they ought to press Russia to pull its troops out of Ukraine and Ukrainian sovereign territory.”

“But I don’t think you can reasonably look at China as impartial in any way. They haven’t condemned this invasion. They haven’t stopped buying Russian oil and Russian energy,” he said on Tuesday. “President Xi saw fit to fly all the way to Moscow, hasn’t talked once to President Zelensky, hasn’t visited Ukraine, hasn’t bothered to avail himself of the Ukrainian objective.”

“And he and his regime keeps parroting the Russian propaganda that this is somehow a war of the West on Russia, that it’s some sort of existential threat to Mr. Putin. That’s just a bunch of malarkey. Ukraine posed no threat to anybody, let alone Russia,” Kirby said.

Do you have a tip on a world news story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about China, Russia or Ukraine? Let us know via [email protected]

Filed Under: Uncategorized World, Xi jinping, Vladimir Putin, China, Russia, Ukraine, taliban afghan peace talks, afghan taliban peace talks, afghan taliban and us peace talks, rimworld how to peace talks, trump xi meeting june 2019, putin xi jinping birthday, putin xi modi, putin xi panda, putin cancels meeting, putin un meeting

After Xi-Putin meeting, Team Biden still doesn’t get what’s just happened to the United States

March 22, 2023 by www.foxnews.com Leave a Comment

close
Keith Kellogg: China's Xi trying to be 'the great negotiator' in wake of Putin meeting Video

Keith Kellogg: China’s Xi trying to be ‘the great negotiator’ in wake of Putin meeting

Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg and former CIA station chief Dan Hoffman discuss the the new China-Russia partnership and escalating tensions amid the ongoing war in Ukraine on ‘Your World.’

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

“Changes are taking place now that haven’t happened in a hundred years. When we are together, we drive these changes,” proclaimed China’s President Xi Jinping as he was saying goodbye to his “dear friend” Vladimir Putin in Moscow this week. “Agreed,” responded Russia’s president.

Now that the three-day meeting is over what are the implications for the West, Europe and the world? Here’s a look at what to expect (and not to expect) going forward.

Two leaders herald a permanent anti-U.S. bloc with China as global center of gravity

Before Xi and Putin met in what will has all the hallmarks of a historic meeting, the two leaders published manifestos in their respective state newspapers, outlining their vision for the world that directly challenges the Western-rules-based democratic order. Throughout the summit-level meeting, both authoritarians signaled their strong anti-U.S. and anti-West sentiment and intention to oppose America’s leadership at every turn.

VLADIMIR PUTIN, XI JINPING SIGN ECONOMIC DEAL IN LATEST DEMONSTRATION OF ‘FRIENDSHIP WITHOUT LIMITS’

Xi, in a signed article with the headline “Forging Ahead to Open a New Chapter of China-Russia Friendship, Cooperation and Common Development,” praised Moscow and Beijing’s role in fostering a “new model of major-country relations” based on “mutual trust.” The article also ran Monday in Russia’s National Gazette.

Xi and Putin will use the United Nations to push back against the U.S. and the West

In what appears to be a direct message to the West, Xi reminded readers that China and Russia are permanent members of the U.N. Security Council who pursue “comprehensive strategic partner of coordination” and “uphold an independent foreign policy.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping shake hands in Moscow, Russia, on Tuesday, March 21.  The Kremlin Wednesday said the West's reaction to Xi's visit has been "hostile."

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping shake hands in Moscow, Russia, on Tuesday, March 21.  The Kremlin Wednesday said the West’s reaction to Xi’s visit has been “hostile.” (Mikhail Tereshchenko/Sputnik/Kremlin Pool Photo)

Putin, who authored an article in China’s People’s Daily Newspaper, highlighted the “special nature of the Russia-China partnership,” built on “respect for each other’s sovereignty and interests.”

In a dig at NATO, he noted that the Moscow-Beijing relationship is of a different quality, having no “Cold War-time military-political alliances” with “no one to constantly order” and to “constantly obey.”

CHINA IS ALREADY AT WAR WITH AMERICA, AND THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION IS IGNORING THE SIGNPOSTS

It was a clear message that the two authoritarians, both of whom probably will remain heads of state for life, will continue using the United Nations Security Council as a platform to oppose every major action on the Western agenda.

By holding state-level talks with Putin, just days after the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for the Russian dictator for war crimes in Ukraine committed by the Russian forces in there, Xi made it clear to the West that China disregards international law that was built on Western principles.

Putin’s Russia is now playing second fiddle to Xi’s China

China’s leader gave his Russian counterpart his strongest support yet by endorsing Putin’s prospective 2024 presidential reelection. “Thanks to your strong leadership, Russia has made significant progress in achieving the prosperity of the country in recent years. I am sure that the Russian people will strongly support you in your good endeavors,” Xi told Putin.

Putin, who has always projected the image of a hardened ruler of a nuclear superpower, gave Xi a clear acknowledgment that China is now the higher-ranking partner in the relationship.

In his greeting statement on Monday, the first day of Xi’s visit, Putin was effusive and subserviently towards Xi. He called him “Esteemed Mister Chairman!” and “Dear Friend!” He observed that China has made a “colossal breakthrough forward in its development, attracting genuine attention across the world,” adding that “we [Russia] are even a little jealous.”

Chinese President Xi Jinping gestures while speaking to Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Monday.

Chinese President Xi Jinping gestures while speaking to Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Monday. (Sergei Karpukhin, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)

Russia’s economic dependence on China is growing as the U.S. and European sanctions have all but cut off Moscow from the West. Beijing has been providing an economic lifeline to Moscow, importing Russian energy, which has helped Putin continue financing his war on Ukraine .

CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER

Last year, the Kremlin’s budget revenue jumped from $52.8bn to $81.3bn, thanks to Chinese purchases of crude oil and coal. The economic cooperation between the two will increase with Putin and Xi having signed ten agreements, lasting till 2030. Putin aims to grow trade with China , which has reached $189 billion, to $200 billion. Russia has one of the world’s largest deposits of natural resources and China has the world’s largest population. With Western sanctions likely not being removed from Russia any time soon, Russia’s dependency on China will only grow.

China is cultivating Russia’s dependence as it seeks to expand its geopolitical and economic influence in Eurasia,’ the world’s largest landmass, through its Belt and Road Initiative.

This massive China-led transcontinental infrastructure project aims to connect supply chains and logistics across the globe, enabling China’s rise as the global center of gravity. As a junior partner to Xi, Putin who seeks cooperation between Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union and China’s Belt & Road, is enabling China’s grand plan of becoming the dominant economic and military power by 2049, displacing its top rival, the United States.

Ukrainian troops retook a wide swath of territory from Russia on Monday, pushing all the way back to the northeastern border in some places, and claimed to have captured many Russian soldiers as part of a lightning advance that forced Moscow to make a hasty retreat. (AP Photo/Kostiantyn Liberov)

Ukrainian troops retook a wide swath of territory from Russia on Monday, pushing all the way back to the northeastern border in some places, and claimed to have captured many Russian soldiers as part of a lightning advance that forced Moscow to make a hasty retreat. (AP Photo/Kostiantyn Liberov) (AP Photo/Kostiantyn Liberov)

No peace for Ukraine

Although Xi’s visit to Moscow was billed by Beijing as an effort to help bring a ceasefire to Russia’s barbaric war with its former Soviet neighbor, the tête-a-tête between the two authoritarians is highly unlikely to bring peace to Ukraine.

China is highly incentivized to have the war drag in and Xi will likely approve deliveries of lethal military assistance to Russia. Having two of its top perceived geopolitical adversaries deplete their combat arsenals in a proxy war benefits China.

While Russia and China portray themselves as “no limits” strategic partners, in reality, they are adversaries in the long term. The two share a border of around 2,500 miles and a tumultuous history. Both expect to face off in a military clash in the future.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Changes are indeed coming in the world. Regretfully, the Biden administration which is hyper-focused on Ukraine, is blissfully unaware that the two dictators are upending the world order on which the United States and its allies relied for security for decades.

It is time for the adults in the Biden White House to think critically and strategically.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM REBEKAH KOFFLER

Rebekah Koffler is the president of Doctrine & Strategy Consulting, a former DIA intelligence officer, and the author of  ” Putin’s Playbook: Russia’s Secret Plan to Defeat America .” Follow her on Twitter @Rebekah0132 .

Filed Under: Uncategorized greatness doesn't just happen, why united states doesn't use metric system, why doesn't the united states have universal healthcare

Copyright © 2023 Search. Power by Wordpress.
Home - About Us - Contact Us - Disclaimers - DMCA - Privacy Policy - Submit your story