• Skip to main content

Search

Just another WordPress site

Watch listen

Are You Really Listening Or Just Waiting To Talk? There’s A Difference

August 6, 2020 by www.forbes.com Leave a Comment

  • Share to Twitter
  • Share to Linkedin

When we think of characteristics of a strong leader, “great listener” typically isn’t one of the first skills to come to mind, but maybe it should be. Particularly in this Covid-19 era as leaders are managing stressed, anxious employees often hesitant at best about the return to work, qualities like empathy and emotional intelligence will be in high demand – possibly separating leaders who succeed from those who fail. Arguably, one of the most necessary ingredients for this style of leadership is the ability to listen actively and authentically. No, not just vanilla, run of the mill listening that virtually anyone can do, but another level of listening.

Let’s face it – when someone else is talking, very often we’re not really listening to their point or concern. Instead, too often we quickly decide that we know their point and immediately focus our mental energy into formulating our response. When we think about it, this really shouldn’t be that surprising. As human beings we’re hard wired to care more about our stuff – our thoughts, opinions, rationalizations, feelings, perspectives, etc. That doesn’t make us bad people (I certainly hope not because I’m definitely wired that way). It just means that for most, active listening is a skill that requires cultivation – it’s not typically automatic.

This deeper, more engaged and empathetic style of listening is often referred to as active listening because it’s just that – active. Passive listening can in fact be counterproductive because it sends the other party the clear message that their message isn’t very important. Ultimately, it may send the message that the listener doesn’t think they’re that important – ouch. Instead, active listening is often described as “listening to understand” vs. “listening to respond.” The Psychology Today article “Feeling Understood — Even More Important Than Feeling Loved?” clinical psychologist Dr. Leon Seltzer explains how the ability to express to others that we “get them” is key to building strong relationships. “I’ve learned over the years how important it is for people to feel that another can pinpoint their thoughts and feelings — and, on the contrary, how upset they can be when they don’t feel understood,” insists Selzer. “In such moments, they experience a break in the relationship — and with that, feelings of uneasiness, aloneness, or irritation.”

The Harvard Business Review article “What Great Listeners Actually Do” refutes the myth that the best listeners are passive sponges simply absorbing others’ feedback. “What these findings show is that good listeners are like trampolines,” explain Jack Zenger and Joseph Folkman. “They are someone you can bounce ideas off of — and rather than absorbing your ideas and energy, they amplify, energize, and clarify your thinking. They make you feel better not merely passively absorbing, but by actively supporting.”

Techniques for Enhancing Listening

Like other leadership skills, listening skills can be enhanced with intentional effort and practice. If this might be an area that you might need to develop or enhance, try a few of these techniques:

– Gather feedback from others. It’s always helpful to first get an assessment of how you’re perceived by others so ask a few trusted friends to provide some candid feedback. Avoid asking direct reports or others who might be tempted to assess you more positively. Most importantly, don’t respond defensively to the feedback or try to explain yourself. Instead, focus exclusively on just getting the feedback and thanking them for it. Your request might sound like this, “Linda, I know how important it is that staff feel listened to during this difficult time so I want to work on my listening skills. It’s hard for me to find people who will tell me the unvarnished truth, but that’s what I’m really seeking. How would you describe me as a listener? Can you think of an example where I listened particularly well/poorly? What can I work on as it relates to listening?”

– Acknowledge emotions during sensitive communications. When someone is highly charged, stressed, or otherwise emotional, it’s counterproductive to respond to the content and ignore the emotion. Indeed, people need to first feel heard with the heart, then the head so begin by acknowledging the emotion. “Jeff, I hear your anger and frustration about the radical shift in timeline, and it’s certainly understandable. Let’s talk through specific issues that will need to be addressed so that you’re not being asked to do the impossible.”

– Develop a habit of repeating back others’ points. One of the best ways to develop a style of “listening to understand” instead of “listening to respond” is by developing a habit of repeating back the essence of someone’s comments (e.g. “So what I heard you say was….Just to be sure I have this right…Your primary concern is….”) There’s a reason why marriage counselors often ask couples to use this mirroring technique with their spouse. Before one partner launches into their version of the issue, it’s imperative that they communicate to their partner that they really heard them first. The same is true in the workplace. Validating the other person’s comment is not just important for active listening; it’s also a tremendously important relationship building tool. People just love feeling heard and since so few people actively listen, there’s a tendency to really value those who do.

– Ask clarifying questions. A great way to truly engage in what someone else is saying is by asking clarifying questions about their comments. Yes, it sends a signal that you’re invested in their comments, but more importantly it mentally engages you more deeply into their comments, issues, etc.

– Avoid multitask listening. We’ve all been frustrated with someone who is ostensibly listening but is actually watching a video, catching up on their email or even mentally focused on their upcoming presentation. If you’re not able to fully focus on someone, it’s often better to be honest about that and suggest an alternate time when you can offer your full attention. “Lisa, I have to be completely honest with you. I’ve got a meeting with Craig in 20 minutes, and I need to prep for that. This issue is too important for me to shortchange it. Can I come find you this afternoon so we can grab a coffee and discuss it in detail?”

Active listening is one of those stealth skills that distinguishes organizational superstars. Indeed, great listening skills are often the “x factor” that we can’t seem to put our finger on but explains why someone is so well liked or seems to negotiate conflict so well. Great listeners build goodwill with every single interaction and that cumulative effect can be powerful. Arguably, listening is one of the most important elements of communication. Too often we’re just focused on ourselves and what we want to say, but the best leaders aren’t focused inward. Instead, they’re focused outward – on their team’s needs and concerns – and listening is oftentimes the first step.

Filed Under: Careers listening skills, communication skills, leadership, inclusive leadership team building, effective communication, communication..., really you just ruined this whole thing, get paid just to talk to guys, talking about foreigners i really could whip, nighttime companions who listen to pillow talk, stupid listen when i talk you better listen, do guys really wait 3 days to text, empathic listening differs from active listening in that, listens really well, nobody listens when i talk analysis, why does rza talk different in season 2

Watch Lizzo Find Her Inner Beyoncé on ‘Carpool Karaoke’

June 28, 2022 by www.rollingstone.com Leave a Comment

Lizzo is the latest celeb to appear on James Corden’s “Carpool Karaoke” and the singer brought a genuine sense of fun to The Late Late Show segment.

Filmed in Los Angeles, the clip showcases Lizzo and Corden driving around while singing several of Lizzo’s hits, including “Good as Hell,” “Juice,” and “Truth Hurts.” They pair also does their own version of Lizzo’s viral Tik-Tok dance for “About Damn Time” alongside a group of dancers and creator Jaeden Gomez.

During the segment, Lizzo gets more serious as she discusses how Beyoncé has inspired her music. “When I was shy or when I didn’t think I was cool and when I was getting picked on, I would listen to Beyoncé in my bedroom and it would transport me,” she recalls. “I would feel something. I would feel like, ‘My life is going to be better. There’s hope for me.’”

She adds, “When I dropped out of college and I was really depressed I listened to B’Day on repeat and I would just sing B’Day all the time. I was like, ‘I’m gonna be a singer. I’m gonna be a singer. The way she makes people feel is the way I want to make people feel with music.’ She’s been my North Star.”

After Corden pretends to call Beyoncé, who Lizzo says she has never met, the pair sing along to “Crazy In Love.”

Last week, Lizzo and Live Nation announced they will donate $1 million from the singer’s Special tour to support abortion access groups following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. The rapper also encouraged fans to donate and volunteer to help abortion access groups via her Lizzo Loves You website , which she launched to help grassroots black organizations in honor of Juneteenth.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Late-Night TV, Lizzo, The Late Late Show With James Corden, carpool karaoke with james corden, carpool karaoke bruno mars, carpool karaoke james corden, Bruno Mars Carpool Karaoke, Broadway Carpool Karaoke, adele carpool karaoke, george michael carpool karaoke, michelle obama carpool karaoke, britney spears carpool karaoke, watch carpool karaoke

Watch: FNC’s Carlson Mocks ‘Woke’ CIA Recruitment Video — ‘At Joe Biden’s CIA, the Spies Talk Mostly About Themselves’

May 5, 2021 by www.breitbart.com Leave a Comment

Tuesday, FNC’s Tucker Carlson reacted to what has become known as the “woke” CIA recruitment ad, which according to Carlson, has raised questions about the efficacy of the agency.

Carlson also questioned that trend within American culture, which he said was steeped in narcissism.

Transcript as follows:

CARLSON: If you’ve been on the internet this week, you’ve probably seen the video we’re about to show you. If you haven’t seen it, there is really nothing we can do to prepare you for the experience of seeing it except to tell you two things about it. First, it’s entirely genuine. This is not a hoax. It’s not a deep fake. It’s not the work of some demented comedic genius who set up a parody account on Twitter. No, this video is real.

The second thing to know about the video is that it’s from the CIA, and that’s not the Culinary Institute of America, the people who teach them baking and sushi preparation. No, it’s not. It’s the Central Intelligence Agency, the guys who do waterboarding and subvert foreign elections.

The CIA is the most heavily armed and supposedly the most sophisticated intelligence-gathering operation on the planet. And yet somehow, they produced this and then put it on social media.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I am a cisgender millennial who has been diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder.

I am intersectional. But my existence is not a box-checking exercise. I am a walking declaration, a woman whose inflection does not rise at the end of her sentences suggesting that a question has been asked.

I did not sneak into CIA My employment was not and is not the result of a fluke or slip through the cracks.

I used to struggle with imposter syndrome. But at 36, I refuse to internalize misguided patriarchal ideas of what a woman can or should be.

I am tired of feeling like I’m supposed to apologize space I occupy rather than intoxicate people with my effort.

My brilliance. I am proud of me. Full stop.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CARLSON: Wait, you’re intersectional? So am I. What year were you? Just kidding.

She didn’t say that. She said I’m a woman of color. I’m a mom. I am a cisgender millennial who has been diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder. And then she told us, hilariously, the spunky new CIA lady. She told us that she is intersectional, but impossible after here — and we’re quoting: “My existence is not a box-checking exercise.”

Well of course it isn’t box-checking, come on. Just a cisgender Latina millennial mom of color with a certified emotional disability, not a hint to box-checking there. In fact, that sounds like pure meritocracy.

If by meritocracy, you mean a system in which narcissism is the highest achievement.

At Joe Biden’s CIA, the spies talk mostly about themselves. You can just imagine what the job interviews must be like. Tell us about yourself, and please don’t ever stop.

So you can change a diaper with one hand and console a crying toddler with the other? Plus, you’re emotionally unstable. Perfect. You’re just the person we’ve been looking forward to foil the next 9/11 plot. Let’s get you to the farm for some weapons training.

That’s your CIA at work.

Now, not everyone has embraced these new hiring standards. “The CIA used to be about mission to country,” wrote former CIA officer Brian Dean Wright, in an observation that was widely shared by many of his former colleagues. Now, it is about demanding and getting accommodation to fix an emotional wound or advance a personal agenda.

America is less safe with this new CIA and dangerously more political. That’s what Brian Dean Wright wrote.

Now, Wright is a sincere and patriotic person. We know him. He is a frequent guest on the show. So we do not contradict Brian Dean Wright lightly.

But is it possible that Wright is taking this video too literally? Could he be missing the point of it? What if the CIA’s latest description of itself is not what it appears to be? This is an Intel agency after all. These are spooks. Their world is a hall of mirrors.

So to you and me and Brian Dean Wright, that video may come off as the Babylon Bee version of identity politics gone wild. But maybe that’s the point of it. Maybe that’s what they want you to think. Maybe there’s something more going on here.

Now for months now, the Biden administration has told us that a group called white supremacists are America’s most dangerous enemy. White supremacists don’t live in the Middle East, their Caliphate is right here in America, in Nebraska and Western Maryland and believe it or not, even in the suburbs outside Minneapolis. Who saw that coming?

How can you tell a white supremacist? How do you know when you’re in the presence of one? It’s simple. Anyone who objects to being called a racist without evidence must be a white supremacist. That’s the working definition of it.

Beyond that, no one has to find the term. People in Washington just repeat the line again and again and again in the apparent belief that frequent repetition makes it scarier, and apparently it does.

Former CIA Director John Brennan seems genuinely alarmed.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

JOHN BRENNAN, FORMER CIA DIRECTOR: Now, looking forward that the members of the Biden team who have been nominated or have been appointed, are now moving in laser-like fashion to try to uncover as much as they can about what looks very similar to insurgency movements that we’ve seen overseas, where they germinate in different parts of a country and they gain strength and it brings together an unholy alliance frequently of religious extremists, authoritarians, fascists, bigots, racists, Nativists even libertarians.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CARLSON: Well, that’s quite a list. Religious extremists, authoritarians, fascists, bigots, racists, nativists, even libertarians. Yes, says John Brennan with a visible quiver in his face, even libertarians, even the guys at the Cato Institution, that’s how deep this white supremacist threat is.

You may be surprised to hear that. You imagined in your naivete, that professional libertarians are merely ridiculous with their stupid little theories that no one has ever tried because they’re so absurd, they would evaporate like steam if they ever made it beyond the walls of whatever Koch funded think tank they live in, though of course, they never will.

But it’s much worse than that. The Cato guys are dangerous, John Brennan says, just like their diabolical friends at AEI, they’re the new al Qaeda. Lock them up. Throw them in prison with those diabetic retirees from Central Florida who have been rotting in solitary since they dared to trespass at the Capitol on January 6th. Lock them away.

From now on, if they want to communicate with Roger Stone, they’ll have to use tap code.

If we need more cells to hold them, there’s a budget for that. Prison reform does not apply to white supremacists. That’s what John Brennan has told us. That’s what they’re all telling us. They repeat it daily.

The question is, does anyone with an IQ over 80 actually believe a word of this? Does anyone in power really think something called white supremacy is the single greatest threat America faces? No, of course not. No one thinks that.

Susan Rice knows it isn’t true, so does Barack Obama. So do all of the other architects of this particular lie. They made it up in the first place, so of course, they know precisely how false it really is.

They may be liars, but they’re not delusional.

In real life, they understand perfectly well what actually threatens America. They’ve seen it up close. It’s the culture that produced them. It’s the decadent, rich people from their class at Harvard. It’s the Gender Studies Department at Cornell. It’s the cat cafes in Austin and Asheville. It’s the Monday editorial meetings at The Atlantic Magazine where David Frum is treated like an important intellectual rather than some dopey middle-aged Canadian Twitter celebrity whose life goal is to force America into yet another unwinnable pointless war.

Those are the people who actually detest the country. They’re the ones who are working through the night to destroy it. They are the people who are committed to and in the process of excusing violence.

So if you wanted to save America, these are the people you’d be worried about. They make the Iranian nuclear program look like nothing.

So maybe the CIA actually does know this. Maybe they really have figured it out. Maybe the intersectional lady with the emotional problems is in fact, a deep-cover operative. Think about that. It makes sense actually.

When defeating ISIS was the goal, we recruited Arabic speakers. Why wouldn’t we? Now that our own professional class is obviously the real threat, we need people who can blend in at McKinsey.

In the Middle East and here, we need the agents who understand the enemy, who speak his language, who understand his customs, who can break bread with tribal leaders in a yurt in the mountains or for that matter in Napa, or on the quad. For a mission like that, we are going to need a brand new kind of spy. The old kind will not do.

Imagine this guy trying to infiltrate the queer dance collective at Brown.

(BEGIN “MR. NO” VIDEO CLIP)

JAMES BOND, FICTIONAL CHARACTER: Admire your courage, Miss —

SYLVIA TRENCH, FICTIONAL CHARACTER: Trench — Sylvia Trench. I admire your luck, Mister —

BOND: Bond. James Bond.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CARLSON: Yes, good luck, pal. Good luck on the Brown campus. Yes, those were cigarettes without filters, but not the right kind. That guy was smoking testosterone-enhancing tobacco. Think the enemy wouldn’t notice that? He would have been arrested at the door on a hormone violation. Game over, cover blown.

They do to him with the Soviets did to Gary Powers, get ready for a show trial.

But this progressive new CIA agent, by contrast, would never be discovered. They wouldn’t suspect her for a moment because she’s just like them. They’re unhappy. She is unhappy. They’ve got diagnosed emotional disorders, so does she.

They can talk about themselves for eight hours at a time, she can, too. Talk about deep cover.

This woman is a natural mole. The Kim Philby of wokeness.

The Biden administration appears to be training a lot of spies like this. They know that this is a war that will not be won in a day. Existential struggles never are. So they are marshaling all the forces of government, from DHS to the President’s own personal flak. Even the Interior Department has a role to play.

Watch these ladies try out their social justice disguises.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR: My name is Laura Daniel-Davis, and I recognize that I live and work within the ancestral lands of the Anacostians in the Anacostia and Potomac River watersheds.

I acknowledge the plant-based knowledge of these peoples and I am grateful for their ancestral and current stewardship of these lands. My pronouns are she/her.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: My pronouns are she and her, and I recognize I live and work within the ancestral lands of the Cheyenne people.

AMANDA LEFTON, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT: My name is Amanda Lefton. My pronouns are she/her. And I am the Director of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. I recognize that I live and work within the ancestral lands of the Ute, Shawnee and Mohican peoples.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CARLSON: Oh, I want to give thanks to Anacostian. I acknowledge the plant-based knowledge of these people, and I’m grateful for their ancestral and current stewardship of these lands. My pronouns are she and her.

Now you listen to that from an employee at the Interior Department and you think to yourself, that can’t be real, and let’s hope you’re right. Let’s hope it’s a ruse.

Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor

Filed Under: Uncategorized CIA, Fox News Channel, Tucker Carlson, Tucker Carlson Tonight, Clips, joe biden en obama, sophie joe biden, campaign joe biden, democratic debate where is joe biden, ukraine joe biden, firefighters joe biden, anita hill joe biden, polls joe biden vs trump, why is leslie knope obsessed with joe biden, joe biden video

Apple Watch again at core of new antitrust suit filed by AliveCor

May 26, 2021 by appleinsider.com Leave a Comment

article thumbnail

AppleInsider is supported by its audience and may earn commission as an Amazon Associate and affiliate partner on qualifying purchases. These affiliate partnerships do not influence our editorial content.

Claiming that Apple “copied” its Apple Watch ECG ideas, medical firm AliveCor is calling for a trial by jury over the case in California courts.

Mobile medical company AliveCor has previously filed a patent infringement suit against Apple in Texas, and also asked the US International Trade Commission to ban sales of the Apple Watch. Now it is requesting a trial by jury over the patent issues, and has filed in the Northern District of California.

According to the full filing, available below, AliveCor claims that Apple initially supported the company’s development of an electrocardiogram wristband, the KardiaBand. “Apple not only initially approved AliveCor’s apps… but also advertised AliveCor’s innovations to sell more Apple Watches,” says the suit.

“AliveCor informed Apple about [it gaining] FDA clearance and that it intended to begin selling KardiaBands shortly along with its previously-approved Kardia and SmartRhythm apps,” continues the suit.

“What AliveCor did not know is that Apple had finally realized heart health analysis was incredibly valuable to (and desired by) smartwatch users, and thus had been working in the background to copy AliveCor’s ideas,” says AliveCor’s filing, “including both the ability to record an ECG on the Apple Watch, as well as to provide a separate app for heartrate analysis.”

“Apple apparently decided that it needed to try to undercut AliveCor’s success and, the same day AliveCor told Apple that it planned to announce its FDA clearance, Apple ‘pre-announced’ a heart initiative for the Apple Watch,” it continues.

Noting that Apple’s “demonstrated commitment to heart health” on Apple Watch “validated AliveCor’s business concept,” the suit says that AliveCor then initially saw an increase in sales “and public brand awareness.”

“But, as it has done multiple times over the years in other markets, Apple decided that it would not accept competition on the merits,” says AliveCor’s suit. It says that Apple “suddenly claimed that [previously approved AliveCor app] ‘violated’ various unwritten App Store guidelines.”

AliveCor says Apple then altered App Store guidelines, and even updated watchOS specifically to “suddenly render SmartRhythm inoperable.”

The 16,000-word filing concludes by saying that AliveCor “has no adequate remedy at law because monetary damages will not afford adequate relief for the loss of [its] business relationships and client goodwill.”

AliveCor therefore seeks trial by jury, with damages to be determined

Apple has not commented publicly on the new filing, nor on the previous patent infringement suit .

Alivecor vs Apple by Mike Wuerthele on Scribd

Follow all the details of WWDC 2021 with the comprehensive AppleInsider coverage of the whole week-long event from June 7 through June 11, including details of all the new launches and updates.

Stay on top of all Apple news right from your HomePod . Say, “Hey, Siri, play AppleInsider,” and you’ll get latest AppleInsider Podcast. Or ask your HomePod mini for “AppleInsider Daily” instead and you’ll hear a fast update direct from our news team. And, if you’re interested in Apple-centric home automation, say “Hey, Siri, play HomeKit Insider,” and you’ll be listening to our newest specialized podcast in moments.


Filed Under: Uncategorized Apple..., Apple Inc, iPhone, iPad, iPod touch, iPod nano, Apple TV, iPod shuffle, iphone 6, iphone 6s, ios 9, ios9, iTunes, i mac, mac os x, mac osx, 27 union square west suite 500 new york ny 10003, push mail apple watch

Goucher Poll Finds Franchot, Moore & Perez Tied In Maryland’s Democratic Gubernatorial Primary

June 28, 2022 by baltimore.cbslocal.com Leave a Comment

BALTIMORE (WJZ) — With Maryland’s July primary election a few weeks out, three Democratic candidates for the state’s highest elected office are running neck and neck, according to the results of a new poll.

The poll of roughly 1,000 likely voters, conducted by Goucher College in partnership with The Baltimore Banner and WYPR, finds Comptroller Peter Franchot, nonprofit CEO Wes Moore and former Labor Secretary Tom Perez are tied in the Democratic gubernatorial primary, with each of them carrying double-digit support.

READ MORE: Maryland Weather: Enjoy This Gorgeous Tuesday

Franchot (16%), Moore (14%) and Perez (14%) polled well ahead of the rest of the Democratic field, trailed by Doug Gansler (5%), John King (4%), and Jon Baron and Ashwani Wain, each of whom had 2%. Over one-third of voters (35%) are undecided, while nearly two-thirds (63%) said they could change their minds.

“Our poll was conducted one month out from the primary election,” said Mileah Kromer, director of the Sarah T. Hughes Center for Politics at Goucher College. “The three frontrunners—Franchot, Moore, and Perez—each have the campaign funds and endorsements to compete for the voters of a largely undecided and malleable Democratic primary electorate. Still, even with the investments of their significant resources, it’s unclear how much attention the average voter will pay to the mid-July primary.”

It’s a similar story in the Republican gubernatorial primary with what is shaping up to be a close race between Dan Cox (25%), who is endorsed by former President Donald Trump, and Kelly Schulz (22%), who has the support of Gov. Larry Hogan. Notably, 44% of voters said they are undecided and nearly half (47%) left the door open to changing their minds.

“Given the political demographics of the state, Republican candidates must earn around a quarter of Democratic votes to win statewide office,” Kromer said. “Our polling suggests that the Republican primary race is competitive between Cox and Schulz, but that Schulz is in the best position to be competitive against the Democratic nominee in the general election.”

Maryland & The Economy

Among other things, the Goucher poll also took Marylanders’ temperature on the state’s future and economy. In general, the results suggest Republican voters shared more negative views about the state’s direction and economic situation compared to their Democrat counterparts.

More than one-third (36%) of Democrats believe the state is heading in the wrong direction, while nearly two-thirds (63%) of Republicans feel that way. Four in 10 (41%) Democrats expressed a negative view of Maryland’s economic situation compared to nearly three-quarters (74%) of Republicans.

One-third of Democrats (33%) believe the state’s economy will suffer more in the coming year, while nearly two-thirds (64%) of Republicans hold that view. A sizable chunk of both Democrats (29%) and Republicans (42%) believe the rising cost of goods (gas, groceries, housing) have caused them significant financial hardship.

READ MORE: Man, 24, Killed In Northeast Baltimore Shooting, Police Say

Voters are also asked about statewide issues, ranging from inflation to crime, and whether or not they represented areas of concern to them. Below is a breakdown of the leading “major” concerns among Republicans and Democrats:

Republicans

  • The cost of gasoline: 90%
  • Inflation: 90%
  • Crime and public safety: 83%
  • The quality of K-12 public schools: 62%
  • The state tax rate or amount of state taxes: 61%

Democrats

  • Inflation: 72%
  • Environmental issues and climate change: 71%
  • Crime and public safety: 69%
  • The cost of gasoline: 69%
  • Lack of affordable housing: 69%

Abortion & Gun Control

Additionally, those polled were also asked about their feelings on abortion (the poll was conducted before the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade) and gun control. By and large, the findings were split along party lines.

A majority of Democrats (60%) believe abortion should be legal, no matter the circumstance, compared to 18% of Republicans who feel the same way. More than half of Republicans (57%) believe it should be legal under select circumstances, compared to nearly one-third (28%) of Democrats who hold that view.

Five percent of Democrats and 18% of Republicans surveyed believe it should be illegal regardless of the situation.

While more than 40% of both Democrats and Republicans say a candidate’s views on abortion are one of the factors they take into account, 30% of Democrats and 16% of Republicans said they would only vote for a candidate who shares their view on the issue.

When it comes to Maryland’s gun laws, nearly three quarters of Democrats believe state laws governing the sale of guns need to be stricter, compared to nearly one-third (28%) of Republicans. Most Democrats (55%) and Republicans (53%) said a candidate’s take on gun control informs their decision making.

MORE NEWS: Black Americans Bear The Brunt Of Rising Grocery, Gas & Housing Prices

The poll was conducted over the phone between June 15 and June 19 with 502 registered Democrats and 507 registered Republicans. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 percentage points.

Filed Under: Uncategorized local, maryland, news, politics, seen on, syndicated local, watch + listen, abortion, goucher college, gun control, inflation, maryland news, peter franchot, ..., Finding your polling station, find your polling place

Copyright © 2022 Search. Power by Wordpress.
Home - About Us - Contact Us - Disclaimers - DMCA - Privacy Policy - Submit your story