Welcomes new apprentice

Debina Bonnerjee and Gurmeet Choudhary are currently on cloud nine as they are all set to welcome their second child soon. Let us tell you, the couple is announcing their pregnancy four months after giving birth to their daughter Lianna.

The Ramayan actress took to Instagram and shared an adorable picture with her husband Gurmeet and her daughter. In the photo, Debina can be seen holding sonography images of their to-be-born baby.

Debina Bonnerjee captioned the post as, “Few decisions are divinely timed and nothing can change that…this is one such blessing..coming soon to complete us. #babyno2 #mommieagain #ontheway #pregnancydiaries #daddyagain #gurmeetchoudhary #debinabonnerjee.”

Well, it is indeed a happy moment for Debina and Gurmeet fans as they are all set to complete their new family member. For the unversed, in an interview with Bombay Times, Debina had said that she faced complications during her first pregnancy. She had revealed that she wanted to embrace parenthood five years ago.

For the unversed, Debina and Gurmeet were blessed with a baby girl on April 3, 2022. Yesterday (August 15), her rice eating ceremony was held. Well now, Debina’s post is going viral on social media, and their fans have been congratulating the couple on the good news!

Filmibeat congratulates Debina and Gurmeet!

Get summer inspired by the bikinis showcased at this swim show!

T he Yandy Swim Show at the New York Fashion Week Spring 2017 displayed some serious summer goals with models sashaying down the runway in colourful bikinis.

A majority of the models who worked up the ramp were from the brand’s home state, Arizona. The idea was to embrace its roots and present the best of Arizona on the New York runway.

Beware: Some of these looks will melt your screens!

• Pics: 10 ways to look hot, NY style!

• #Undefeatables: Not just a fashion show

• In Pics: The anti-Trump fashion show

Scotland may become the first British nation to hand refugees and asylum seekers the vote, leading to concerns of election-rigging by pro-migration parties.

The power to make major changes to the Scottish electorate was devolved to Scotland’s regional administration in 2016, and the governing Scottish National Party (SNP) has already lowered the voting age to 16.

Now, a consultation document is suggesting the franchise be extended to everyone residing in Scotland legally, including non-citizens from outside the British Commonwealth and the European Union.

“As citizens from a very wide range of countries come to live and work in Scotland, it can be considered discriminatory to deny the right to vote to resident immigrants who are neither EU nor Commonwealth citizens,” the document suggests.

“It can be argued that it is undemocratic to give voting rights to some legal immigrants but not to others.

“It seems only just that everyone legally resident in Scotland should have voting rights, allowing them to influence government and parliamentary decision-making.”

➡️ @Ross_Greer ‘s campaign for refugees and asylum seekers to be given the right to vote features in today’s @theipaper

Please like and retweet to show your support ✌️ https://t.co/9h5IowFQDn

— Scottish Greens (@scotgp) January 5, 2018

The Scottish Green Party argued that the change would send the message that Scotland is a “welcoming” nation for migrants, with Scottish Parliament member Ross Greer telling The Scotsman : “Scotland is a welcoming country. Our history of taking in those in need of a safe home is a long one and continues today.

“It was only a few weeks ago we celebrated the 2,000th Syrian refugee to be settled here. What better way could we show refugees and asylum seekers that they truly are welcome and that Scotland is their home than by giving them the right to vote?

“It is only right that all those who live here and are affected by decisions made locally or nationally have a say in choosing those who make the decisions.”

Politicians call for Wales to be turned into world’s first migrant ‘sanctuary’. Did Welsh voters consent to this? https://t.co/63jaOA6Vwj

— Jack Montgomery ن (@JackBMontgomery) April 10, 2017

Responding to Greer, a Scottish Government spokeswoman noted that the administration is “seeking views on extending who can vote in Scottish Parliament and local government elections, to include more people who are citizens of other countries but who have chosen to live here in Scotland.”

She added: “We agree that Scotland is a welcoming country, and we will carefully consider the call to give asylum seekers and refugees the opportunity to vote in elections where we have power to determine the franchise.”

But critics told Breitbart London that pro-migration parties, like the SNP and the Greens, could use such a policy to effectively import new voters to shore up support in marginal electoral constituencies.

“Moves to change the voting system in Scotland to allow refugees and asylum seekers a vote are a dangerous exercise in demographic gerrymandering by so-called progressive parties, who would stand to gain by implementing this change,” warned UKIP’s David Kurten .

“It would be easy to swing an election by directing migrants to live in marginal constituencies in order to obtain power. If this plan is implemented it will make a mockery of our democracy and will be a disgraceful display of putting British people last in our own country.”

Follow Breitbart London on Facebook: Breitbart London

A woman who was asked to look after her stepson because his mom “ended up staying out” for a “piss up” the night before received a storm of support from users on Mumsnet, the U.K.-based online forum.

In a viral post shared by user CottonCandy11 on Mumsnet’s Am I Being Unreasonable (AIBU) forum, where it received 658 comments, the woman said her stepson was due to be back with his mom after spending three nights with the user and her husband.

But his mother asked whether her son could stay an extra night as “she had been invited out to something.”

The original poster said she was “so angry” and is refusing to miss out on a day out with her son.

According to the 2019 American Community Survey (ACS) published by the U.S. Census Bureau , there are estimated to be nearly 2.4 million stepchildren under the age of 18 in the country.

Stepfamilies face various unique stressors, such as co-parental conflict and stepparenting issues, as noted in a March 2017 study published in the peer-reviewed journal Family Process .

The study stated: “Children and adolescents who are exposed to interparental conflict are more likely to perceive it as threatening to their well-being or that of the family, which in turn is a key risk factor for internalizing problems.”

According to the American Psychological Association (APA) , the most challenging element of stepfamily life is parenting. “Under the best conditions, it may take two to four years for a new stepfamily to adjust to living together,” the APA says.

The original poster in the latest Mumsnet post agreed to her stepson’s additional stayover on the “very strict proviso” that his mom picks him up at 8 a.m. the next morning, as the user had a day out planned with her 4-year-old son.

However, the mom messaged the user’s husband “saying sorry [that] she won’t be here for 8 as she ended up staying out so won’t be home yet until about 11.”

The original poster said her stepson’s mom and partner have a baby, so he’s at home with the child. Her stepson also has a house key if the partner is asleep and can’t let him in.

“I’m seriously minded to go and drop him off with her partner. She’ll be furious but I literally couldn’t give a s**t about what she thinks now, she cares about no one else whatsoever. It’s always been the same, hers are the only plans that matter.

“But I’m not missing my day with my son, I’ve been looking forward to it and I’m not having him and me miss out because she wanted to go on a piss up last night and didn’t get home,” the user added.

Several Mumsnet users sided with the original poster, stating the stepson’s “irresponsible” mom is taking the “absolute piss.”

One user said: “Yanbu [you are not being unreasonable], that will firmly send the message across that you aren’t her skivvy. How irresponsible of her. If her dp [dear partner] is there at home, go drop him off.”

Another agreed, stating: “Drop him off. The partner is there – why would she be furious? You should be furious, she has no right to be.”

A third asked: “So you are expected to look after their son but her partner isn’t? Honestly some people just take the absolute piss. I would be beyond livid and would drop him home.”

While another questioned: “If she has a partner at home with their child why couldn’t he have gone back home last night anyway?…I’d drop him back home and leave him with his mom’s partner/step dad.”

Some users advised the original poster should tread carefully for the safety of her stepson.

One said: “I don’t know if I would just go and drop him off, I am in two minds about that. I might be more inclined to deal with it this time, but then I would absolutely refuse to help out again.”

Another asked whether there are any “safety concerns” with her partner and stepson. “Just because he’s looking after their baby doesn’t mean your DSS [dear stepson] is safe with him and as a pp [previous poster] said be mindful of how you handle the situation in front of the boy.”

When another posed the same question, the original poster said: “Yeah he’s fine. He’s done the odd thing in the past but very very rarely. I suspect he’s told her she’s not dumping DSS on him so she can go out and things in the past so now she never asks him.”

Newsweek was not able to verify the details of this case.