• Skip to main content

Search

Just another WordPress site

Why does britain owe iran 400 million

Four things we know about water firm payouts as Ofwat says millions must be handed back

September 27, 2023 by www.express.co.uk Leave a Comment

A couple check their bills

Many water suppliers have been ordered to make payouts to their customers (Image: Getty)

British water suppliers are being forced to pay out to their customers after their regulator exposed key failings across the board.

Watchdog Ofwat has ordered many suppliers to pay back millions of pounds after supply interruptions and failing to hit targets for pollution and leakage.

Those with the biggest amount to pay include Thames Water , which is to pay out £101million and Southern Water, which has been mandated to pay £43million.

Ofwat CEO David Black said these payments will be applied to individual customers through “bill reductions”. Here’s what we know so far:

Don’t miss… Water firms set to pay out millions to customers – see if you’re owed money

  • The regulator told Express.co.uk the way the rules work is if a supplier underperforms they have to charge their customers less.
  • Ofwat itself will not administer these payouts as each supplier is tasked with applying them to their users.
  • It is not known how much individual households will get, or the average amount by which people’s bills will be reduced.
  • Water bills typically change when the new financial year begins in April so those who are owed a payout may see their bills go down next year.

It comes after several suppliers received the lowest rating for their quality of service, including Dwr Cymru, Southern, Thames, Anglian, Bristol, South East and Yorkshire Water.

Don’t miss… Flooding warning as it ‘can happen anywhere’ and cost thousands in repairs [REPAIRS] Pensioners excluded from top savings account as they don’t have internet [PENSIONS] ISA allowance could be raised above £20,000 if savers invest in British business [SAVINGS]

A person pouring a drink of water

Many water suppliers have been ordered to make payouts to their customers (Image: GETTY)

Trending

Invalid email

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

Water companies ordered to lower their bills

  • Affinity Water
  • Anglian Water
  • Dwr Cymru
  • Hafren Dyfdwy
  • SES Water
  • South East Water
  • South West Water (South West and Bristol areas)
  • Southern Water
  • Thames Water
  • Yorkshire Water

In contrast, a number of suppliers were rewarded for their service with Severn Trent Water getting £88million while United Utilities is receiving £25million.

Suppliers who outperform can increase their bills as a result so people with these suppliers may see their bills go up.

David Black, CEO of Ofwat, said: “It is very disappointing news for all who want to see the sector do better.

“It is not going to be easy for companies to regain public trust, but they have to start with better service for customers and the environment.

“We will continue to use all our powers to ensure the sector delivers better value.”

Martin Brown, CCO at FM Outsource, said: “Providing the right communication and a timely refund will be an essential short-term gesture for these providers.

“But when it comes to maintaining trust with the customer, the importance of effective customer service should not be underestimated.

“In the interim, providers need to be prepared for an influx of enquiries following this announcement.”

He warned suppliers need to improve their offering and customer service or they could damage their reputation over the long term.

The water companies’ performance was slammed in light of Tuesday’s news that big beasts of the industry would have to pay out millions.

Environment Secretary Therese Coffey branded the Ofwat report “extremely disappointing” and said that it was “unacceptable” that not a single firm was ranked as “leading”.

Ms Coffey said she and her ministerial team will be meeting with CEOs in person and scrutinising plans for improvement.

Labour’s shadow environment secretary, Steve Reed, said the report was “devastating” and showed “the complete failure of water companies to act on the sewage scandal”.

His remarks come after a year in which pictures surfaced showing prominent water companies pumping human waste in the sea off Britain’s coastline.

Mr Reed added that “stinking, toxic sewage lapping up on our rivers, lakes and seas” was a “damning metaphor for 13 years of Conservative failure”.

Nine private water companies were found to have discharged waste for a total of 1.75million hours in 2022, an Environment Agency report revealed back in May.

For the latest personal finance news, follow us on Twitter at @ExpressMoney_.

Related articles

  • Mapped: The millions receiving £300 payment – check your area
  • State pensioners with cataracts and other conditions could get extra £101 a week
  • Martin Lewis urges savers to look at ‘jaw dropping’ accounts paying 6.2%
  • Disturbing AI voice scam ‘impossible’ to tell apart from a genuine call
  • State pension increases ‘should be linked to MPs pay if triple lock scrapped’

Filed Under: Personal Finance water bills supplier payouts, cost of living, Personal Finance, payout for mega millions, payout mega millions, payout on mega millions, payouts for mega millions, payouts mega millions, mega millions payouts, soluble things in water, mega millions payout calculator, payout on mega millions lottery, cash payout for mega millions

The Victorian government is making sweeping changes to housing across the state. So what does that mean for you?

September 20, 2023 by www.abc.net.au Leave a Comment

Victoria is growing faster than any other state in the country.

There’s expected to be more than 10 million people here in 2051, but there aren’t enough homes being built for them to live in.

The cost of renting or buying a house is the highest it’s been in decades so the state government has released a plan it says will boost housing supply and push prices down.

The plan announced on Wednesday sets out some big ideas to tackle the state’s problem-riddled housing industry — and not all of them are popular across the board.

Reactions to the overhaul have ranged from charity Anglicare welcoming it as a “historic” move that would serve as an important step forward when many are being “pushed out of the bottom of the housing market”, to harsh criticism from groups including the state’s opposition.

Opposition leader John Pesutto described the changes as a “shameless con” and warned it failed to address the fundamental causes of the state’s housing crisis.

Some of the measures that will be taken include a plan to build 800,000 new homes in Victoria over the next 10 years, with reforms to processes for approvals.

A 7.5 per cent tax will be applied to short-stay accommodation, a new dispute resolution body will be set up and the state’s public housing blocks will be rebuilt.

So what exactly might the raft of changes mean for you?

An industry crisis centred on a supply shortfall

Housing remains a hot topic, surrounded by enormous debate on how to make it more affordable.

Largely, discussions have centred around a lack of housing supply .

The demand for housing including rental properties is surging , yet the rate of building approvals and commencements is slumping .

Housing affordability in Victoria is at its lowest in 30 years with interest rate hikes and booming prices making it increasingly harder for Aussies to service a mortgage.

Vacancy rates for rentals are also at a record low and the price to rent is rising at its fastest rate in 15 years.

The collapse of construction companies across the country, caught out by rising prices when they had written fixed price contracts, and a shortage of tradies is also playing a part in slowing down new builds.

Recent natural disasters have also had an impact with local governments now dealing with a range of emergency services to determine whether houses are resilient to fire and flood.

A fresh start for public housing — with a long-term view

The government plans to knock down and rebuild all of Victoria’s 44 public high-rise towers by 2051, with the first five to be replaced by 2031.

“Our 44 high rise towers are old, they are out of date, they are crumbling, they need to go,” Premier Daniel Andrews said.

The towers in Flemington, North Melbourne and Carlton will be the first to go.

The rebuild is expected to triple the number of residents that can live in the state’s public housing towers, from 10,000 to 30,000 by 2051.

The Victorian Council of Social Service (VCOSS) said more social housing is an “unequivocally good thing for Victoria” but there needs to be “genuine ongoing engagement with tower tenants”.

“This process should ensure tenants feel supported, empowered and respected, and given much clarity and certainty as possible,” it said.

But the lack of detail has some worried.

While several public housing groups welcomed the announcement, questions remain about how many units will be social housing and how many will be affordable housing.

Social housing refers to both public and community housing, which is run by or in conjunction with the state government, whereas affordable housing is a broader term that refers to housing suitable for low-to-moderate income households.

The Greens have said there are some “red flags” about privatisation and outsourcing of public housing.

“Labor needs to guarantee this will remain public housing and won’t involve the sale or leasing of the land to a private entity,” spokesperson Max Chandler-Mather said.

“This government privatises by stealth, so we are concerned that this announcement could really mean the end of public housing in Victoria.”

The Victorian Public Tenants Association echoed those concerns.

“We urge government to be transparent as to who will ultimately be the manager of these properties, in order for this announcement to be as positive as it seems on the surface,” its CEO Katelyn Butterss said.

“Ensuring these new high rises are public-owned and publicly-managed is absolutely imperative.”

An ambitious goal to build 80,000 new homes a year

Victoria is the fastest-growing state in the country and Melbourne is set to become Australia’s biggest city by the end of the decade.

To ensure the housing problem doesn’t get worse, the government said 1.6 million homes need to be built by 2051.

But to actually ease the pressure, the government said it needs to build 2.24 million by 2051, which equates to about around 80,000 new homes a year.

It’s an ambitious target but the government has promised to do exactly that — build 80,000 homes a year, for the next decade.

To reach this target, the government will transform office buildings in the CBD that aren’t being used into thousands of affordable apartments.

The plan also identifies 10 areas across Melbourne where a target of 60,000 new homes has been set.

These priority areas include Broadmeadows, Epping, Niddrie, North Essendon and Preston in the city’s north, Ringwood and Camberwell Junction in the east and Frankston, Moorabbin and Chadstone in the south-east.

The plan says “clear planning controls” will be introduced to get those homes built but what that will look like remains unclear.

About 45 sites described as “surplus government land” will be sold and developed, which it’s estimated will make room for 9,000 homes.

These sites have not yet been listed but the government said the developments would include at last 10 per cent affordable housing.

A promise to make planning approvals easier

Power will be taken away from local councils and given to the planning minister to fast-track some housing developments.

The premier said there was a backlog of 1,400 planning decisions “sitting on people’s desks”.

“This is not about blame, this is not about having a go at anybody, that’s just an unacceptable backlog and we all need to work together to make sure we clear that backlog,” Mr Andrews said.

“It’s not acceptable for applications to be lagging, gathering dust for years. We need to get on and turn those applications into houses.”

Under the changes, decisions on larger developments that include at least 10 per cent affordable housing will be delivered within four months.

And you’ll no longer need a planning permit to build single story houses and no permits will be required for granny flats if they are less than 60 square metres.

Renters to access ‘portable bond’ and a new dispute resolution service

The government won’t introduce rent freezes or caps as part of the changes, instead, there will be more restrictions on landlords hiking rent.

There will also be what’s called a “portable bond”, meaning you’d be able to transfer your existing bond to a new lease if you move so you don’t have to fork out twice.

And a new dispute resolution service which aims to provide early intervention for common rental problems such as repairs and bonds to minimise escalation to VCAT.

“VCAT should be the last resort not the first,” Mr Andrews said.

There will also be changes to notices for rent increases and the end of a tenancy.

Tenants Victoria said the statement acknowledged that renters are a growing sector and that “their rights need to be strengthened, regularly reviewed and enforced”.

“The rental housing crisis simply won’t disappear overnight, but the combination of these new measures will help address the pain points renters tell us they are facing,” director of community engagement, Farah Farouque, said.

A nation-first tax on short-stay accommodation

The government will introduce what it has called a “modest” 7.5 per cent tax on short-stay accommodation platforms such as Airbnb and Stayz from 2025.

Mr Andrews said income from the levy would go towards Homes Victoria, to fund the construction of social and affordable housing.

The statewide levy on short-stay accommodation is the first in Australia, opening the possibility of other states following suit.

The premier said the single levy would mean the sector would not have to deal with different fees charged by local councils which may differ from area to area.

“We think it’s only fair that those platforms, whether it’s Stayz or AirBnB, have one framework to comply with, not one for every local government area across the state,” he said.

But the tourism industry have criticised the move, saying it “goes too far”.

“If people have to absorb a 7.5 per cent tax, they’ll reconsider how long they’re staying,” Felicia Mariani from Tourism Victoria said.

Some new housing stock will be built in the regions

The housing overhaul is largely focused on Melbourne, but the government is also promising to build more than 400,000 new homes across regional Victoria by 2051.

The $1 billion Regional Housing Fund, which was already announced in July, has set a target of building 1,300 new homes across the regions in a mix of social and affordable housing.

The government has pledged to streamline the approvals process for regional developments worth more than $15 million if they include 10 per cent affordable housing.

It’s also promising that 25 per cent of the short-stay accommodation tax will be invested in regional Victoria.

A Regional Worker Accommodation Fund to provide new housing options for key workers struggling to find a place to live has also been allocated $150 million.

Posted 20 Sep 2023 20 Sep 2023 Wed 20 Sep 2023 at 7:36pm , updated 21 Sep 2023 21 Sep 2023 Thu 21 Sep 2023 at 6:12am

Filed Under: Uncategorized housing, rental, rent, housing market, affordable and social housing, policy, government, state government, affordable..., for any substance why does the temperature remain constant during the change in state, housing does mean, 2 government bodies that may make informal changes, fantail in house what does it mean, how does kmt explain changes of state, full house why does jesse last name change, why queensland is the only state government without an upper house of parliament, government by officials in a state meaning in hindi, makes my flesh crawl what does it mean, that then i scorn to change my state with kings meaning

Water firms set to pay out millions to customers – see if you’re affected

September 26, 2023 by www.express.co.uk Leave a Comment

An engineer from a water company

Water companies are to pay out millions of poudns (Image: GETTY)

Water companies are to pay out millions of pounds to customers after falling short of key targets for pollution and leakage, and after supply interruptions have affected billpayers.

Thames Water is the company that has to pay out the most, with more than £101million to send to customers, followed by Southern Water , which has to pay out £43million.

Ofwat has confirmed the payments after several suppliers were found to be in the lowest category for their quality of service, including Dwr Cymru, Southern, Thames, Anglian, Bristol, South East and Yorkshire Water.

Not one supplier achieved the top ‘leading’ category for their quality of service and 10 suppliers were rated merely ‘average’ for their provision.

David Black, CEO of Ofwat, said: “It is very disappointing news for all who want to see the sector do better.

READ MORE Flooding warning as it ‘can happen anywhere’ and cost thousands in repairs

“It is not going to be easy for companies to regain public trust, but they have to start with better service for customers and the environment.

“We will continue to use all our powers to ensure the sector delivers better value.”

Ofwat said is investigating all 11 water and wastewater companies with live enforcement cases for six companies for potential failures on sewage discharges into the environment.

They are also investigating Dwr Cymru and South West Water in relation to the accuracy of leakage reporting and per capita consumption.

Don’t miss… Mapped: The millions receiving £300 payment – check your area [PAYMENT] Savers urged not to be scared to switch as rates remain high [SAVINGS] Disturbing AI voice scam ‘impossible’ to tell apart from a genuine call [SCAM]

A person getting a drink of water

Water companies are to pay out millions of poudns (Image: Getty)

However, some suppliers were rewarded for their efforts, with Severn Trent Water taking £88million while United Utilities receives £25million.

Since 2020, companies have shown improvements in reducing leakage and internal sewage, with all but one company achieving the target for unplanned outages, though progress has been too slow across the board, Ofwat said.

The regulator said the payout figures are provisional until it completes the review process.

Express.co.uk asked Ofwat for more details about how the payouts would be administered and how much they would vary depending on a person’s situation.

Invalid email

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

The regulator said its draft determinations set out how much the companies can collect from customers in the following financial year.

Companies that outperform can charge their customers more while those who underperform have to reduce their charges.

Ofwat said it could not provide modelling on how these draft determinations will impact customers and what range of payouts people will receive.

Mike Keil, senior director at the Consumer Council for Water, said: “Customers are tired of not getting the service they deserve for the things they care about.

“It’s right and fair that people get their money back when they don’t receive the services they were promised by some water companies. People want assurance that their water bill is good value for money.”

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said on Monday that it is providing more funding to reduce the amount of times sewage is pumped out of storm overflows, adding another £4billion on to the £56billion it announced last year.

Trending

Environment Secretary Therese Coffey said: “Today’s Ofwat report is extremely disappointing. While I acknowledge there is good work ongoing in some companies – cleaning up waterways and investing in vital infrastructure – there is simply not enough of it.

“The fact that not a single water company is classified as leading is unacceptable.

“We have written to the CEOs of every water company in the lowest category of today’s report and my ministerial team and I will meet them in person to scrutinise their improvement plans.”

Labour shadow environment secretary Steve Reed said: “This devastating report demonstrates the complete failure of water companies to act on the sewage scandal.

“There can be no more damning metaphor for 13 years of Conservative failure than stinking, toxic sewage lapping up on our rivers, lakes, and seas.”

Problems have dogged the nation’s water firms in recent months, with outrage expressed over sewage being pumped into the sea off Britain’s coasts.

Thames Water’s boss, Sarah Bentley, resigned from the company after rejecting the bonus to which she was entitled amid furore over filth being splashed into coastal waters.

Her resignation was followed by fears that Thames Water could collapse entirely, triggering emergency meetings on possible strategies to save the firm.

In June, Whitehall was drawing up plans for what to do in the event that the provider collapses in light of massive debts of £14billion.

This followed fury at British water companies paying billions to their foreign owners while dumping human waste into rivers here at home.

The Environment Agency in May revealed that the nine private companies who manage Britain’s water had discharged waste for a total of 1.75million hours in 2022.

Research also found that the companies paid out a total of £1.4billion in dividends that same year, which was two-and-a-half times more than they’d paid in 2021, despite the worsening performance.

Two months earlier, a group called Surfers Against Sewage were so incensed at the performance of water companies in Britain that they set up a petition.

Tweeting back in March, they said: “We’re swimming in sewage while water company bosses swim in cash. At the same time, they’re racking up enormous fines and reporting huge financial losses. Does that seem fair? We don’t think so either.”

Their Dirty Water Campaign accused companies of profiting from pollution.

The watchdog Ofwat only has power to police the water companies’ operations, not to decide or change when and how they reward their investors.

For the latest personal finance news, follow us on Twitter at @ExpressMoney_.

Related articles

  • Renewable energy output has increased by 500% but key factors limit growth
  • Mortgage rates continue to fall but 485,000 brace for payments surge
  • Broke carer forced to sofa-surf for years thanks to council house waiting list
  • State pensioners with cataracts and other conditions could get extra £101 a week
  • Martin Lewis urges savers to look at ‘jaw dropping’ accounts paying 6.2%

Filed Under: Uncategorized Water companies payout, utilities water companies, Personal Finance, millions custom format excel, 8-firms-set-to-get-rs-2500 cr-optical-fibre-supply-contract, how paying extra principal affects mortgage, vodacom reaches 5 million customers, buyout firm buys $800 million of assets from itself, how can dissatisfied customers affect a business, discriminatory pricing occurs when a firm sets, firmly set crossword clue, firmly set crossword, firm underwriter pays for

Donald Trump faces bankruptcy, Michael Cohen says

September 27, 2023 by www.newsweek.com Leave a Comment

Donald Trump will not be able to pay the damages that could be imposed on him by a judge overseeing New York Attorney General Letitia James’ fraud lawsuit and will be forced to declare bankruptcy, according to his former lawyer Michael Cohen .

Cohen, whose 2019 congressional testimony triggered the investigation that resulted in James’ $250 million suit against the former president and his company, The Trump Organization, made the claims after a judge ruled that Trump had committed fraud while providing financial statements valuing several of his properties for years.

On Tuesday, Judge Arthur Engoron resolved one of the main claims in James’ lawsuit that Trump had provided “false and misleading” statements inflating the value of his properties and assets by billions of dollars in order to obtain financial benefits and better loans.

Engoron ruled that the New York business certificates of The Trump Organization will be canceled, as well as any certificates of companies owned by Trump and two of his sons, Eric and Donald Trump Jr., which may result in the former president’s companies being removed from his control and dissolved.

In a statement after the ruling, Trump said the “widespread, radical attack” has ” devolved to new, un-American depths” and is planning to appeal. Newsweek has contacted The Trump Organization for comment via email.

The ruling means that the issue of whether Trump, his two sons, and The Trump Organization committed fraud while valuing numerous properties will not need to be decided in the civil trial when it begins on October 2 and will now mainly determine the size of the penalty.

Speaking to CNN ‘s Kaitlan Collins on Tuesday, Cohen said that while James’ filed a $250 million lawsuit against Trump and his real estate company, this is just a “baseline figure” and that the judge could impose a far greater fine which Trump will not be able to pay.

“Judge Engoron will be the sole decider on what the damages are. The damages, in my estimation with interest and penalty, will exceed $600 million,” Cohen said.

“Does that put the company into bankruptcy? He [Trump] does not have that liquid cash available in order to pay that off.”

Trump’s office has been contacted for comment via email.

Cohen said that there are a “multitude of reasons” to suggest Trump will not be able to pay off a fine larger than the $250 million cited by James, even if he manages to sell his 40 Wall Street building in Manhattan, New York, for $400 million.

“Many of the assets that he owns, he has limited to no basis in them like 40 Wall Street, $1 million basis. You also have, say, a $100 million mortgage onto it,” Cohen said. “He’s also going to have to pay Uncle Sam tax on the money between the basis and the sale price.

“He doesn’t escape that. Everybody has to pay that. So, let’s say it’s 50 percent. So that would be 200 million, minus the 100 that he owes to the banks on it. So there’s 100 million left in order to be used to offset whatever the judgment will be.”

Collins asked Cohen whether Trump would be able to continue to conduct business in New York following Engoron’s ruling, to which he replied “no.”

“Because what ultimately happens is the Attorney General will cease to allow those companies to exist by pulling the licenses, by pulling its license to be active in the state of New York,” Cohen said. “So all of those assets will end up going into some form of a receivership, and as a result of the receivership, the companies will end up getting liquidated.”

In a statement after the ruling, Trump called the judge “deranged” and accused him of “doing the bidding” of the “completely biased and corrupt” New York Attorney General.

“We are rapidly becoming a communist country, and my civil rights have been taken away from me,” Trump said. “This is Democrat political lawfare and a witch hunt at a level never seen before.”

In her own statement following Tuesday’s decision, James said: “A judge ruled in our favor and found that Donald Trump and the Trump Organization engaged in years of financial fraud. We look forward to presenting the rest of our case at trial.”

Filed Under: Uncategorized U.S., Donald Trump, Michael Cohen, New York, Fraud, Letitia James, Trump organization, Arthur Engoron, donald trump advice on choosing a career, we are number one donald trump, donald trump trump tower, donald trump dump trump, ivana trump donald trump, john trump donald trump, donald donald trump, donald trump the donald, donald trump bankruptcy, donald trump face

Damian Lillard trade grades: Bucks land Giannis a new co-star, but no team earns an ‘A’ in blockbuster deal

September 27, 2023 by www.cbssports.com Leave a Comment

Getty Images

Damian Lillard and Giannis Antetokounmpo are about to be teammates. Lillard, who turned 33 in July and is coming off the best season of his 11-year career, will be traded to the Milwaukee Bucks in a three-team blockbuster on Wednesday.

In return for their franchise player, the Portland Trail Blazers will get center Deandre Ayton and forward Toumani Camara from the Phoenix Suns , plus an unprotected 2029 first-round pick and two unprotected pick swaps (2028, 2030) from the Bucks. They will also receive star guard Jrue Holiday from Milwaukee, but he could be quickly rerouted to a contender, per ESPN .

In addition to sending Lillard to Milwaukee, Portland will send center Jusuf Nurkic , forward Nassir Little and guard Keon Johnson to Phoenix. The Suns will also acquire sharpshooter Grayson Allen from the Bucks.

This is the kind of trade whose ripple effects will be felt all around the league. What moves will the Miami Heat , who were Lillard’s preferred destination and have two open roster spots, make now? Do the Toronto Raptors , who were linked to Lillard in recent days, have something else up their sleeves? How might this affect trade talks involving disgruntled Philadelphia 76ers star James Harden ?

For now, though, we’ll focus on the ramifications for the three teams that are directly involved in this deal. Let’s grade the trade.

Bucks grade: B+

First, the macro: Milwaukee’s franchise player can hit free agency in 2025 and has repeatedly said that he’ll leave if he doesn’t feel the organization is as committed as he is to winning another championship. The Bucks flamed out in the first round against Miami a few months ago, and, while they were able to retain Khris Middleton and Brook Lopez this summer, they didn’t do much to address their longstanding issues with halfcourt offense. Had they not taken a big swing like this, they would have effectively been counting on the 33-year-old Holiday, 32-year-old Middleton and 35-year-old Lopez to find some kind of new formula under new coach Adrian Griffin. Lillard is in that same age bracket, but Milwaukee has never had a playmaker like him. Ideally, this trade will ensure Antetokounmpo signs another contract with the team that drafted him 10 years ago and give the entire franchise a sense that it is cooking up something special rather than trying to reheat something stale.

Now, the micro: The Bucks, health permitting, should have a better halfcourt offense than they ever did in the Mike Budenholzer era. They should not get stagnant against elite playoff defenses, they should not lose their poise in crunch time and they should not suffer that much if Middleton regresses a bit as a creator. As a result of injuries and roster construction, Antetokounmpo set new career highs in usage (37.3%), and field goal attempts (20.3 per game, 29.2 per 100 possessions) last season, and you can expect those numbers to drop significantly. Lillard’s presence means Antetokounmpo (and Middleton, for that matter) will have a lighter load and take easier shots.

Milwaukee’s challenge is to make sure that the offensive boost is not completely offset on the other end. Holiday is one of the league’s premier defenders: a terror at the point of attack, a top-tier screen navigator and as switchable as any 6-foot-5 player has ever been. Lillard himself has called him the best defender in the league. The Bucks do not have anyone on the roster who can approximate what Holiday did for them defensively for the past three seasons, and they might have some remorse about letting Jevon Carter , another mean point-of-attack guy , get away in free agency. After putting more defensive responsibility on Lopez’s shoulders last season by dialing down its help defense, Milwaukee is now testing the rim protector’s limits — we know he and Antetokounmpo can cover up mistakes on the perimeter, but, dating back to the days of Eric Bledsoe and Malcolm Brogdon , the first line of defense has always been a big, strong, physical guard.

Fortunately for the Bucks, today is not the trade deadline. It is possible that wing Marjon Beauchamp , who had some promising moments as a rookie, particularly on the defensive end, quickly develops into the type of player that can either A) produce on both ends in the playoffs or B) be traded for someone who can. If that does not happen, though, the team defense will not have much margin for error, and, given all the picks that are out the window, neither will the front office.

Blazers grade: B

Portland and Phoenix swapped bigs who have been on the trade block forever, and it makes sense that the Blazers got the 25-year-old one. And while getting only one first-round pick outright in exchange for a Hall of Famer might sound bad, that’s not the way to look at it. In June 2028, when the first Bucks pick could go to Portland, Lillard will be weeks away from his 38th birthday and Antetokounmpo will be a few months older than Lillard is now. The Blazers will definitely get Milwaukee’s pick a year after that, and they will have the option to swap picks again another year later. They are betting that, by then, the Bucks’ title window will have closed. Given the roster-building restrictions that Milwaukee’s front office will face in the next few years with Lillard’s enormous salary on the books, this seems like a smart bet.

Holiday’s trade value is baked into this deal, so any assessment of how Portland fared will be more accurate once he’s on another team. Some factors at play: Holiday will be eligible to sign an extension (worth up to $223 million over four years) six months after he is traded again, and he has previously said that he plans to retire at the end of this contract, which includes a $37.4 million player option for 2024-25. How does he feel about that now? Is there somewhere specific he’d like to spend the rest of his career? All of this will affect what kind of offers the Blazers are able to find, but Holiday is undoubtedly the kind of player a contender would part with young players and picks to acquire. It worked out well when the Bucks did it.

Ultimately, the bigger variable here is how Ayton develops. He starred in his role in the Suns’ 2021 Finals run, but did not stay on that trajectory. Ideally, Portland will be the perfect place for him — there’s room for him to expand his offensive game, and, if he can consistently bring the defensive scheme versatility that he had during his most productive stints in Phoenix, then the former No. 1 overall pick can get his career back on track. In a worst-case scenario, Ayton approaches this as nothing more than an opportunity to show what he can do with the ball in his hands … but even then, at least the Blazers were finally able to shed Nurkic’s contract. Worth a shot!

Suns grade: B+

Remember all those stories about how much Frank Vogel loves Ayton? The NBA is funny.

This one is pretty simple: Ayton might end up being (way) better than anyone Phoenix got in this deal, but it probably wasn’t going to happen in Phoenix. The Suns are maybe the most all-in team in history, and if the starting center’s relationship with the team was beyond repair, then they needed a new starting center.

Phoenix’s depth, which was a clear weakness in the immediate aftermath of the Kevin Durant trade, is now a massive strength. Take the center swap out of it, and Allen, Little and Johnson add to the already long list of role players the front office managed to add this offseason despite only having minimum contracts to offer free agents. (Allen and Little can also be added to the list of potential fifth starters .) In fact, the Suns now have literally too many guys — 17 players are signed to standard contracts, and that number must be reduced to 15 before opening night. This is potentially bad news for Ish Wainwright, whose contract is not guaranteed.

Offensively, Nurkic should thrive in Phoenix. Vogel can use him as a hub, and his screening will help the Suns’ many shooters get open looks. As a passer, he’s a clear upgrade over Ayton, which will make it more difficult for teams to trap Durant, Devin Booker and Bradley Beal . The risk here, though, is that this trade might have lowered the Suns’ defensive ceiling. Due to age and injury history, Nurkic seems less likely than Ayton to return to form as a pick-and-roll defender. It will help to have Durant roaming on the weak side, but if Nurkic gets played off the floor in the conference finals, who is replacing him? Drew Eubanks ? Chimezie Metu ? Smallball? All imperfect answers.

Despite this risk, it’s easy to understand Phoenix’s rationale, particularly when you factor in what it has done to its cap sheet. Allen (who will feast on open 3s) is owed $8.5 million over each of the next two seasons, Little (a steal if he makes his 3s) is owed a total of $28.5 million over the next four and Johnson is still on his rookie deal. The Suns have essentially broken up Ayton’s max contract into several smaller, tradable ones, giving the coaching staff and front office more pieces to play with as they try to shape this new group into a championship favorite.

Filed Under: Uncategorized NBA, damian lillard which team, damian lillard to bucks, damian lillard what team, 5 star hotel deals new york city, bucks trade new, new deal trade, star citizen can't land at new babbage, star citizen land at new babbage, taiwan u.s. to sign first deal under new trade framework, trade for damian lillard

Copyright © 2023 Search. Power by Wordpress.
Home - About Us - Contact Us - Disclaimers - DMCA - Privacy Policy - Submit your story