• Skip to main content

Search

Just another WordPress site

Womens reproductive rights

‘We’re here’: Mexican groups slam U.S. abortion restrictions as they help more American women

July 1, 2022 by www.nbcnews.com Leave a Comment

MONTERREY, Mexico — At first glance, it only looks like a roof terrace in a house in Monterrey in the Mexican state of Nuevo León, two hours from the border with the U.S.

It’s a small space, with a kitchen and bathroom, called La Abortería, or the abortion place, and it’s become a haven for dozens of women and pregnant people — both from Mexico and the United States — who have decided to interrupt their pregnancy with the use of medication.

“You have to talk about abortion as a responsible decision,” said Vanessa Jiménez Rubalcava, one of the space’s founders, in an interview with Noticias Telemundo. “Abortion is a loving and safe decision. It’s also a simple medical procedure.”

The abortion center has 17 people who advise and accompany the medically induced abortion processes of some 500 women every month, and it’s part of the network Necesito Abortar Mexico , or I Need to Abort Mexico, a project created six years ago to support people who need guidance on abortion.

“It’s about providing all the emotional, physical, economic tools so that women experience an abortion in a dignified manner,” said Ileana Sandoval, a woman who has undergone two procedures with the network’s support and who is now part of the project.

This counseling space is the first public place in Mexico that has been created for these purposes, and, paradoxically, it’s in Nuevo León, a state where abortion is still a crime, despite the fact that Mexico’s Supreme Court declared that it’s unconstitutional to criminalize those who undergo the procedure.

“We follow the protocols established by the World Health Organization and by the Mexican Ministry of Health,” said Sandra Cardona, a member of the network. “We use mifepristone and misoprostol as specified by both institutions in [pregnancy] cases that are already in week 12 or 14, and after that to make it safe. We accompany [the women in] these processes, both in person here and through calls and text messages or WhatsApp.”

Cardona and Jiménez Rubalcava said that even before the U.S. Supreme Court reversal of Roe v. Wade , groups and abortion providers in Mexico began to detect an increase in the influx of people contacting them from the U.S.

“Before, I only spoke to two or three people from the United States a year, but since March, they write to us at least seven or 10 a week,” Jiménez Rubalcava said. “It’s a different world, and we believe that demand can continue to grow.”

Members of a network of volunteers, with people in Mexico and the United States, said they are ready to advise and answer questions from U.S. women seeking to have an abortion. According to these organizations’ calculations, they have already served some 1,700 people from the U.S. so far this year.

They have established cross-border alliances and drug banks in various regions in the U.S. to meet the high demand for information and abortion medication since the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision.

Many clinics located near the Mexican border are expecting a dramatic increase in patients. As of September 2021, a Texas law prohibits abortions after about the sixth week of pregnancy; before, they were allowed until week 20.

“We are here; they are not alone,” Cardona said. “No one should be left behind, and there should be no women without rights, which is what they are trying to do in the United States. There are no second-class women. It’s not possible that in Mexico we already have these advances and there go backwards.”

Mexico’s Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that an underage girl can get an abortion without parental consent if she has been raped. And in May, the southwestern state of Guerrero voted to allow abortions , becoming the ninth of the country’s 32 federal entities where women can legally end pregnancies.

According to Profem , a medical organization that defines itself as helping with the legal interruption of pregnancy in Mexico, 25% of its clientele comes from the U.S. In Monterrey, people who travel from the U.S. buy abortion medications that cost $20 to $150, but at La Abortería they can be free.

Americans seek help amid ‘difficult situations’

The Mexican activists say that almost all people seeking help use means such as social networks to contact them and, in many cases, are more than six weeks pregnant. In addition, they often express the fear they feel about what might happen to them legally when they return to their homes in the United States.

“We try to make each one experience abortion in the most dignified way possible,” Jiménez Rubalcava said. “I remember the case of a girl from Texas whose doctor wanted to send her to another state that was about 10 hours away, but she preferred to travel to Monterrey, which is only 2 1/2 hours. She also had family here.”

“She came with her mother; we were talking and solving all those doubts, and everything went very well,” Jiménez Rubalcava said. “In fact, when she returned to Texas, she told me: ‘And now how do I tell my gynecologist, because he knew I was pregnant. I’m very scared.’ And I asked her to tell the truth, that the abortion was done at five weeks, which is legal in Texas, and that’s how it was. But they are new, difficult situations.”

Abortion rights activists in Latin America and the U.S. worry that with the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, the country is one of the few where restrictions on abortions are increasing.

“The case of the United States is an example that women’s rights can never be taken for granted, not even in the Global North. They are rights that must be constantly defended, and permanent actions must be taken to avoid any type of setbacks,” said Cristina Rosero, senior legal counsel at the U.S.-based Center for Reproductive Rights, which advocates for reproductive rights as a human right through a network of attorneys.

During the last 25 years, the global trend has been toward the liberalization of abortion laws, and recently, large Latin American countries have taken steps in that direction, as are the cases of the three most populous nations: Argentina, Mexico and Colombia.

Despite this, Latin America still is one of the most restrictive regions for abortion. Central American countries such as Honduras, El Salvador and Nicaragua totally criminalize abortion, which has resulted in women resorting to unsafe and dangerous procedures, and a criminalization of those who have obstetric emergencies.

Teodora del Carmen Vásquez is a Salvadoran activist who spent almost 11 years in prison after she lost her son in a miscarriage.

“Unfortunately, because I did not have immediate medical assistance, I lost my baby. Besides, I almost died, and then I went to jail,” she said. “That is the suffering that affects us women. We are the ones who pay the consequences of these laws so unfair.”

Although legal movements in defense of women’s rights have achieved the release of 65 women who were detained in El Salvador, there are still four in prison, and the most recent conviction occurred a month and a half ago.

“We are quite concerned about what happens in the United States because it is a bad example. We do not like that what happens here is replicated in other countries,” Vásquez said.

Then there are countries where abortion is allowed when the life of the pregnant person is at risk, as is the case in Chile, and in other Latin American countries, other abortion allowances include rape, incest or a fetus that is not viable. Countries such as Costa Rica, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia, among others, fall into the latter category.

“We have an interesting wave in several of the most representative countries that are moving towards an increasingly broad decriminalization of abortion,” Rosero said.

‘Barbaric setback’

The green tide, as the movements in defense of abortion rights are known, have influenced legal changes.

In September, the Mexican Supreme Court of Justice unanimously decided that criminalizing abortion was unconstitutional. Since then, five more Mexican states have moved to legalize abortions. Months later, the Colombian Constitutional Court ruled that abortion was no longer a crime.

Both rulings followed the legalization of abortion by Argentina’s Congress in 2020, meaning three of the four most populous countries in Latin America have accepted abortion rights in recent years.

“In order to achieve the progress in Colombia and Mexico, without a doubt, mobilization has been a key point,” Rosero said. “At least the criminalization of women has stopped a little, the persecution of the issue; they have begun to talk beyond the stigma, but there is still a long way to go.”

Activists like Laura Salomé Canteros see the processes of decriminalization or legalization of abortion as part of the universal demand for human rights, a movement that in countries like Argentina is closely linked to the fall of the dictatorship and the advent of democracy.

“We work a lot from a popular perspective,” Canteros said. “We promote what we call social decriminalization to change society first. The truth is that the right to abortion is sovereignty over the body, over decisions and over life. That is why we achieve demonstrations with hundreds of thousands of people of all ages.”

In Argentina, Law 27,610 legalized access to the voluntary interruption of pregnancy in 2020, establishing that all people with the capacity to gestate have the right to access an abortion until the 14th week. However, women whose cases fall under the grounds of “risk to the health or life of the woman or sexual violence” can have an abortion without a time limit.

“The United States is a barbaric setback, honestly,” Canteros said. “But it’s also an opportunity to organize and fight in an intersectional way, because that is what the judicial, legislative and executive channels are for. There is a wake-up call for the Democratic Party in the next elections.”

Despite recent changes, not everyone in Mexico supports abortion rights. A country that is almost 78% Catholic, according to the 2020 census , there are various organizations that condemn access to the procedure.

“When a woman decides to have an abortion, she’s attempting against a life. We propose prevention, education and even contraceptive policies,” said Juan Manuel Alvarado, a member of the group Familias Fuertes Unidas por México, which translates to Strong United Families for Mexico, which is against abortion.

“This pro-abortion tourism, it comes in a cascade. It comes massively, and there are no restrictions,” Alvarado said.

AActivists like Sandra Cardona are used to hearing criticism from the most conservative sectors of Mexican society. In fact, in many cases they were part of that trend before devoting themselves entirely to the defense of women’s rights.

“I was also one of those closed people because, when I was a teenager, I gathered signatures to criminalize women for having abortions,” she said. “First of all, I understand them, but what I tell them is that this decision belongs to each woman, each person with ability to gestate. We do not have to decide on the bodies of other women.”

An earlier version of this article was first published in Noticias Telemundo.

Follow NBC Latino on Facebook , Twitter and Instagram .

Filed Under: Abortion Rights

Abortion-rights protesters rally in US, spurred by draft Supreme Court opinion

May 4, 2022 by indianexpress.com Leave a Comment

Protesters rallied under the slogan “off our bodies” in cities across the United States on Tuesday, demanding abortion rights be protected after the leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion that would overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision.

Thousands of people turned out for an abortion-rights rally in New York City, one of the largest demonstrations as Americans awoke to political and social upheaval, months before voters go to the polls in congressional midterm elections.

“I hope it inspires people to show up in the midterms and vote, and that’s the one thing that I’m looking at as a positive,” Alaina Feehan, 41, a talent manager in New York City, told Reuters, calling the moment a “call to action.”

Protests were held, or planned, in US cities coast to coast, including Atlanta, Denver, Philadelphia and Los Angeles, as the national Women’s March organisation urged supporters to bring families and signs to “courthouses and federal buildings everywhere” promoting the social media hashtag #BansOffOurBodies.”

Best of Express Premium
UPSC Key-July 1, 2022: Why to read ‘Office of Chief Minister’ or ‘Sponge …

A century old, how Gita Press came to be ‘leading purveyor of print…

Explained: 5 ways in which the iPhone changed the world in 15 years

Explained: What unchanged small savings rates mean for banks, savers

More Premium Stories >>

The Supreme Court itself became the epicenter for some of the earliest protests on both sides of the issue after the surprise publication of the 98-page draft ruling late on Monday by the news outlet Politico.

Demonstrators converged on the sidewalk just beyond the barricaded marble steps of the courthouse across from the US Capitol, boisterously but peacefully voicing support for and opposition to ending a constitutional right to abortion nationwide.

Several dozen anti-abortion activists dominated the protests early in the day, beating on drums and chanting through megaphones: “Pro-choice is a lie, babies never choose to die,” and “Abortion is violence, abortion is oppression.”

Some knelt in prayer.

One man wearing a pink sweatshirt in support of Roe v. Wade tried in vain to tamp down the chants of an anti-Roe protester by holding his hand over her megaphone.

‘We’re going backwards’

Abortion rights advocates shouted back, “Off our bodies” and “abortion saves lives.” Others held signs reading, “Abortion is healthcare” and “Abortion is not a dirty word.” One sign displayed by a group identifying as Roman Catholics supporting abortion access said: “Thou shalt not steal my civil rights.”

By late afternoon, a larger and growing assembly of well over 1,000 abortion-rights protesters held sway, with about two dozen anti-abortion activists relegated to the sidelines.

Pro-abortion demonstrators protest outside the US Supreme Court after the leak of a draft majority opinion to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion-rights decision later this year, in Washington, US May 3, 2022. (Reuters)

“I just feel that we’re going backwards,” Jane Moore, 64, said of the prospect that Roe, which legalised abortion nationally nearly 50 years ago, could be struck down. “It actually breaks my heart and makes me angry at the same time.”

“It makes me very afraid. I feel very sorry for … young women. You’re starting all over again,” Paula Termini, 70, a nurse who has worked in delivery rooms and Planned Parenthood clinics, told Reuters outside the court. “It’s going to take a long time to get those gains back again.”

The protests in Washington were a prelude to rallies planned by abortion-rights advocates in cities across the country.

About 300 people gathered in downtown Atlanta just outside the city’s Centennial Olympic Park on Tuesday evening, their chants in support of abortion rights drowned out periodically by the din of honking horns from passing motorists.

“We will fight in these streets, we will fight in every street in America if we need to,” said 19-year-old Wendy Nevarez-Sanchez, holding a “Hands off my uterus” sign.

In the Los Angeles suburb of Pasadena, some protesters carried coat hangers, a grim reference to “back-alley” abortions that experts could become common again in states where abortion is outlawed.

Perhaps the day’s largest rally emerged in New York City, where at least 2,000 abortion-rights protesters assembled in lower Manhattan’s Foley Square, waving signs with such slogans as “Bans Off Our Bodies” and “Abortion is Freedom.”

“I’m here standing up for my people. I’m here to say that reproductive justice is immigrant justice,” said Diana Moreno, 34, pointing to how low-income women and the undocumented would be disproportionately affected by the loss of abortion rights.

A handful of demonstrators around Foley Square waded into the street and briefly blocked traffic.

One of the more colourful acts of anti-abortion protest earlier in the day emerged in San Francisco, where a man calling himself the “Pro-Life Spiderman” scaled a downtown skyscraper while posting video footage of his climb on Instagram. Local news media reported that police took the man into custody.

UPSC KEY Have you seen our section dedicated to helping USPC aspirants decode daily news in the context of their exams?

Filed Under: Uncategorized Roe v. Wade, us abortion rights, abortion, us news, abortion in us, abortion rights rally, womens rights, indian express, indian express news, todays news, Roe..., civil rights cases supreme court, abortion supreme court, colorado supreme court opinions, california supreme court opinions

AOC slams Lindsey Graham over filibuster ousting: “You sound insecure”

July 1, 2022 by www.newsweek.com Leave a Comment

GOP Senator Lindsey Graham ‘s assertion that liberals are committing “an assault on democracy” in the United States was met with a quick backlash from Democratic Representative Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez.

“It took us 50 years to overturn Roe vs Wade,” Graham tweeted. “We worked hard, won elections, and put conservatives on the court. 5 days after losing at Supreme Court, Democrats want to blow up the Senate!”

The senator was referring to Donald Trump ‘s three successful justice nominations that expanded the Court’s conservative majority. His multiple tweets on Thursday also alluded to President Joe Biden ‘s willingness to get an exception to the Senate filibuster rule in an effort to preserve abortion rights after Roe was overturned by the Supreme Court last week. Biden said Thursday he supports codifying the right to an abortion into federal law and is urging Congress to do so.

In response to Graham, Ocasio-Cortez tweeted , “You sound insecure. As you should be. Your attempt to seize bodily autonomy from millions of women & LGBT+ people is a stain on our country.

“I don’t care how long you ‘worked’ to seize control of people’s bodies,” the New York Democrat continued. “That right belongs to individuals, not you. We will not comply.”

Newsweek reached out to Ocasio-Cortez and Graham for comment.

It’s not just abortion rights that Biden has had in mind when talking about filibuster changes. Earlier this year, he said he supported altering the Senate rule to get a voting rights bill on the chamber’s floor.

On Thursday, the offices of Democratic Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema reiterated that they are not in favor of changing the filibuster rule, even if it would help in codifying abortion rights into federal law. Both senators have said they disagree with women’s reproductive rights becoming more limited.

Last week, Ocasio-Cortez participated in a protest outside the Supreme Court after its decision on Roe went public, fulfilling what many expected when a majority draft opinion from the conservative justices was leaked in May .

Other controversial decisions were handed down by the Court before the conclusion of its term Thursday. They include striking down a gun-carrying law in New York state, reducing the regulatory power of the Environmental Protection Agency and rescinding the Trump-era “remain in Mexico” policy , which prevented migrants from seeking asylum in the U.S. while waiting for immigration hearings.

This week, Graham also issued a warning about what liberals are “planning” if the GOP doesn’t gain control of the Senate in this November’s midterm elections.

“These people are crazy,” the South Carolina senator said. “They want to pack the Supreme Court. They want to abolish the Electoral College so New York and California can pick the president. They want to federalize all elections so they can ballot-harvest and do away with voter I.D.”

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said on June 25 that Biden “does not agree with” expanding the number of justices on the Court. She did not elaborate.

The Court has had nine justices for about 150 years , but the Constitution does not specify an exact number, which has changed seven times in U.S. history. There have also been two instances of “court packing,” one of which ultimately failed.

“In 1801-1802 the Federalists are on their way out,” Joshua Braver, an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin Law School, told Newsweek . “They lose in the revolution of 1800 and the election to Jefferson, and they’re really afraid of Jefferson.”

This led to the disappearance of a Court seat during a lame-duck session, although Jefferson later restored the seat.

A successful Court size reduction occurred in 1866. Congress approved a drop from 10 justices to seven following the Civil War in an attempt to limit President Andrew Johnson’s powers during Reconstruction.

Filed Under: Uncategorized Politics, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Aoc, Lindsey Graham, Filibuster, Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Supreme Court, Court Packing, Reproductive rights, Roe v Wade, codify, Karine...

The repeal of abortion rights sparked an online run on contraception. Bay Area telehealth companies are trying to keep up

July 1, 2022 by www.sfchronicle.com Leave a Comment

Bay Area-based telemedicine companies that provide reproductive health services are experiencing a spike in demand for contraception since the Supreme Court struck down the constitutional right to abortion last Friday.

In its 5-4 ruling to overturn Roe v. Wade, the court said its reasoning only applied to abortion. But in a concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas signaled that other constitutional rights, including the right to contraception, may be legally vulnerable. The potential threat has led to reports of women stockpiling emergency contraception pills . In response, pharmacies, such as Amazon and Rite Aid, have placed caps on the number of packs that customers can buy at one time.

Favor, a San Mateo-based telemedicine company that provides birth control pills, vaginal rings and emergency contraception to an estimated 240,000 users across the country, saw emergency contraception purchases soar more than 5,000% last Friday, said Stephanie Swartz, senior director of policy and public affairs. Demand for emergency contraception remains higher than usual, she added, as are requests for birth control pills.

“Friday’s ruling is already causing a seismic shift in the reproductive health-care landscape across a number of factors,” Swartz told The Chronicle. “While this ruling itself was shocking to us, it wasn’t a surprise,” she added, noting that the company has been preparing for this since late last year.

Nurx, another telemedicine company based in San Francisco, also saw “a big surge in demand for emergency contraception,” said Kelly Gardiner, a company spokesperson, in an email. Demand for prescription-only Ella, a type of emergency contraception, was 10 times higher than usual last Friday.

“Since then demand has leveled out a bit but remains a lot higher than normal,” Gardiner wrote.

Birth control requests are also reportedly two to three times higher than usual. And since Friday, Nurx has seen a 20% rise in birth control patients who have added emergency contraception to their orders, she added.

On Monday, Nurx tweeted that users may experience delays as a result of the sudden increase in requests.

In recent years, telemedicine companies have played an increasingly important role in extending access to a variety of contraceptive methods to people across the country. Favor and Nurx were founded in 2016 and 2015, respectively. These companies, along with others, service hundreds of thousands of women across the U.S.

A 2019 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that telemedicine is more convenient and accessible than in-person clinics, and reduces barriers to accessing contraception.

Telemedicine services may also benefit low-income and marginalized communities facing barriers to care, such as high costs or discrimination, according to the research group Brookings . These services are especially important for those in contraception deserts, or counties without access to comprehensive reproductive health-care, including vast parts of California .

“Unfortunately, long before the devastating Roe decision, we’ve really had a separate and unequal health-care system when it comes to sexual and reproductive health across the country,” said Amy Moy, the chief external affairs officer of the California nonprofit Essential Access Health.

While birth control and emergency contraception remain legal in all 50 states, not everyone has easy or equitable access. Moy noted that factors such as where someone lives or whether or not they have health insurance coverage can impact people’s access to contraception.

Last summer, a policy paper in the Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal said California, which was the first state to regulate telemedicine services back in 1996 , could continue to be a national leader on reproductive rights by using the evolving technology to expand access to medical abortions, including for minors.

Earlier this year, Assembly Member Cristina Garcia, D-Bell Gardens, proposed a bill to pilot reproductive health clinics in five underserved counties, with telemedicine services listed as a way to increase equitable access to non-English speakers. While AB 2320 passed the Assembly, it is currently stuck in the Senate.

More on Roe v. Wade Overturned

Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade: ‘The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion’

Roe v. Wade overturned: Californians dismayed over ‘dark day’ in nation’s history

The post-Roe future California has been prepping for is here. How the state plans to welcome abortion-seekers

These are the California candidates running in 2022 who do not support abortion rights

California has a quarter of U.S. abortion clinics. They’re still outnumbered by anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers

Megan Kavanaugh, a principal research scientist at the Guttmacher Institue , a research and policy organization, said that the court’s decision may lead to an influx of abortion seekers traveling to states where the procedure remains legal, such as California . She said the combination of incoming and existing patients could impact the ability of brick-and-mortar clinics to provide timely services, including contraceptive care.

“I think that’s where telehealth will potentially fill a gap,” Kavanaugh said.

Kavanaugh also stressed that contraceptive access is not a substitute for abortion services and that she sees barriers to accessing contraception and abortion as two sides of the same coin.

“They are all efforts to restrict people’s reproductive autonomy and freedom,” she said.

Chasity Hale is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: [email protected] Twitter @chas_hale

Filed Under: Uncategorized Clarence Thomas, Stephanie Swartz, Megan Kavanaugh, Kelly Gardiner, Chasity Hale, Cristina Garcia, Amy Moy, Ella, Brookings, AB 2320, @chas_hale, California, ..., bay area wedding venues, places to visit in bay area, temp agencies bay area, bay area temp agencies, bay area wedding photographers, bay area dog rescue, bay area moving company, Motts Run Reservoir Recreation Area, abortion rights, national abortion rights action league

‘A loss for women everywhere’

July 2, 2022 by opinion.inquirer.net Leave a Comment

The Philippines has one of the most restrictive laws when it comes to abortion,” says reproductive rights advocate Ana Santos. “It is one of the remaining countries where women who access abortion and the health care staff who provide abortion services can be punished with fines and up to six years of imprisonment,” Santos writes in her column “DASH of SAS.”

Indeed, not only is abortion considered a crime in our country, public discussion of it is repressed and considered reprehensible. And yet, as Santos points out: “In the eyes of the law, abortion is a crime. In the reality of women’s lives as told in tentative whispers and in hushed conversations, abortion is an open secret.”

So, why should the recent US Supreme Court ruling overturning what many have called the “landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling” that recognized women’s constitutional right to abortion, concern Filipinos—men, but especially women?

Because, as New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern declares: The decision was “a loss for women everywhere.” She adds: “Watching the removal of a woman’s fundamental right to make decisions over their own body is incredibly upsetting.” US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi was even more brutal. What she called the “Republican-controlled Supreme Court” has done is no less than achieving its “dark and extreme goal of ripping away women’s right to make their own reproductive health decisions.”

For Filipino women, lack of access to safe and high-quality reproductive health services, including abortion, has had truly deadly consequences. Health data reveal that an estimated 100,000 women are hospitalized annually due to complications related to unsafe abortions, with about 1,000 of them dying.

The death toll arises from the alarmingly high number of abortions performed each year, with 610,000 recorded in 2012.

Abortion is also a lot more common than many may think. US studies show that one in four women will need an abortion by the time she reaches age 45. If that woman were your wife, sister, friend, or daughter, you’d better hope that whatever the reason, she would have access to a health services provider who is trained and provides safe, sanitary, and humane treatment.

“In 2022,” says the Philippine Safe Abortion Advocacy Network in a statement reacting to the Roe v. Wade ruling, “no woman should still be fighting for their basic rights. The health and safety of every woman should not be debated.” The group urges governments, including that of the Philippines, “to step up and respond to this devastating setback with progressive reforms providing adequate legal guarantees and protections to safe abortion.”

Inquirer columnist Anna Cristina Tuazon wrote that by removing the constitutional right to privacy and bodily autonomy, the US high court’s ruling has “far-reaching implications on our private lives and intimate relationships.’’ “The issue of abortion then risks being solely about the right of the unborn child and not about the rights of women,’’ Tuazon wrote.

Given the decades (nay, the centuries) of official hostility to the very notion of legalized, safe, and accessible induced abortion, the possibility of enacting “legal guarantees” seems remote at best. But Filipino women need only remember the decadeslong bruising and brutal battle over the passage of the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act to realize that while it might seem a “mission impossible” right now, at the very least the decriminalization of abortion might be a battle worth waging and possibly winning.

At the moment, it would be best to revisit how the reproductive health law has been implemented, and whether women and families had better access to reproductive health services since its passage in 2012. Under the law, the local government units, under the guidance of the Department of Health, are mandated to provide the full range of responsible parenthood and health services, including access to family planning methods for all its constituents.

True, even in the implementation of the reproductive health law, supporters continue to face daunting obstacles that stem not from legal impediments but from deeply held and entrenched attitudes and hostility against women’s rights and autonomy, even if it involves something as intimate and private as control over her own body.

At the end of the day, isn’t this precisely the battle that women, and the men who love, respect, and support them, need to dedicate their lives to? Isn’t it a gift worth leaving to the girls following in their footsteps, and treading the same road to autonomy and self-respect

Subscribe to our opinion newsletter

Filed Under: Uncategorized when was uconn women's basketball last loss, when was uconn women's last loss, treatment women's hair loss, causes women's hair loss, reasons why women's hair loss, dutasteride for women's hair loss, best shakes for women's weight loss, workout plan for women's weight loss, women's best weight loss

Copyright © 2022 Search. Power by Wordpress.
Home - About Us - Contact Us - Disclaimers - DMCA - Privacy Policy - Submit your story